Bug 2125068 - Non-responsive maintainer check for hpejakle
Summary: Non-responsive maintainer check for hpejakle
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED NOTABUG
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: byobu
Version: 38
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Priscila Gutierres
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2022-09-07 21:31 UTC by Filipe Rosset
Modified: 2023-11-23 17:47 UTC (History)
7 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2023-11-23 17:47:36 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Bugzilla 2069103 0 unspecified CLOSED Please branch and build byobu in epel9 2023-12-21 22:36:22 UTC

Description Filipe Rosset 2022-09-07 21:31:24 UTC
This bug is part of the non-responsive maintainer procedure for hpejakle, following https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Policy_for_nonresponsive_package_maintainers/.

Please respond if you are still active in Fedora and want to maintain byobu


Inactive user, latest build in 2015
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/userinfo?userID=1008

I'd like to become the admin for byobu (I'm already taking care of this package for years)

Comment 1 Thomas Stephen Lee 2023-02-04 22:20:30 UTC
(In reply to Filipe Rosset from comment #0)
> This bug is part of the non-responsive maintainer procedure for hpejakle,
> following
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/
> Policy_for_nonresponsive_package_maintainers/.
> 
> Please respond if you are still active in Fedora and want to maintain byobu
> 
> 
> Inactive user, latest build in 2015
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/userinfo?userID=1008
> 
> I'd like to become the admin for byobu (I'm already taking care of this
> package for years)

Please post in the devel mailing list as per policy.

Comment 2 Ben Cotton 2023-02-07 15:08:58 UTC
This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora Linux 38 development cycle.
Changing version to 38.

Comment 3 Jesper Reenberg 2023-05-08 09:41:13 UTC
Any update on this?  Anything I can do?

Comment 4 Harisfazillah Jamel 2023-07-01 06:24:18 UTC
Hi, we need Byobu for EPEL9. Can this be done by other maintainer?

Comment 5 pdennert 2023-11-13 16:50:48 UTC
What needs to be done to get byobu into EPEL9?

Comment 6 Fedora Admin user for bugzilla script actions 2023-11-19 00:10:42 UTC
This package has changed maintainer in Fedora. Reassigning to the new maintainer of this component.

Comment 7 Fedora Admin user for bugzilla script actions 2023-11-22 12:08:52 UTC
This package has changed maintainer in Fedora. Reassigning to the new maintainer of this component.

Comment 8 Priscila Gutierres 2023-11-23 17:47:36 UTC
Closing this bug since I took byobu's ownership.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.