Bug 2125068 - Non-responsive maintainer check for hpejakle
Summary: Non-responsive maintainer check for hpejakle
Keywords:
Status: NEW
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: byobu
Version: 38
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Jan Klepek
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2022-09-07 21:31 UTC by Filipe Rosset
Modified: 2023-07-01 06:24 UTC (History)
6 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed:
Type: ---
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Bugzilla 2069103 0 unspecified NEW Please branch and build byobu in epel9 2023-06-23 10:17:28 UTC

Description Filipe Rosset 2022-09-07 21:31:24 UTC
This bug is part of the non-responsive maintainer procedure for hpejakle, following https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Policy_for_nonresponsive_package_maintainers/.

Please respond if you are still active in Fedora and want to maintain byobu


Inactive user, latest build in 2015
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/userinfo?userID=1008

I'd like to become the admin for byobu (I'm already taking care of this package for years)

Comment 1 Thomas Stephen Lee 2023-02-04 22:20:30 UTC
(In reply to Filipe Rosset from comment #0)
> This bug is part of the non-responsive maintainer procedure for hpejakle,
> following
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/
> Policy_for_nonresponsive_package_maintainers/.
> 
> Please respond if you are still active in Fedora and want to maintain byobu
> 
> 
> Inactive user, latest build in 2015
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/userinfo?userID=1008
> 
> I'd like to become the admin for byobu (I'm already taking care of this
> package for years)

Please post in the devel mailing list as per policy.

Comment 2 Ben Cotton 2023-02-07 15:08:58 UTC
This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora Linux 38 development cycle.
Changing version to 38.

Comment 3 Jesper Reenberg 2023-05-08 09:41:13 UTC
Any update on this?  Anything I can do?

Comment 4 Harisfazillah Jamel 2023-07-01 06:24:18 UTC
Hi, we need Byobu for EPEL9. Can this be done by other maintainer?


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.