Bug 2125615 - [NMCI] libnm_snapshot_reattach_unmanaged_ports_to_bridge regressed
Summary: [NMCI] libnm_snapshot_reattach_unmanaged_ports_to_bridge regressed
Keywords:
Status: VERIFIED
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9
Classification: Red Hat
Component: NetworkManager
Version: 9.1
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: rc
: ---
Assignee: Fernando F. Mancera
QA Contact: David Jaša
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2022-09-09 13:08 UTC by Vladimir Benes
Modified: 2023-08-10 13:25 UTC (History)
8 users (show)

Fixed In Version: NetworkManager-1.43.90-1.el9
Doc Type: No Doc Update
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed:
Type: Bug
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Issue Tracker NMT-650 0 None None None 2023-07-04 11:01:57 UTC
Red Hat Issue Tracker RHELPLAN-133659 0 None None None 2023-07-04 11:01:55 UTC
freedesktop.org Gitlab NetworkManager NetworkManager merge_requests 1693 0 None opened manager: allow controller activation if device is deactivating 2023-07-18 12:44:07 UTC

Description Vladimir Benes 2022-09-09 13:08:16 UTC 
Description of problem:
we fixed this for the latest releases but somehow regressed in 1.41 again. 

https://tools.dqe.lab.eng.bos.redhat.com/vbenes/nm_ci_stats/stats.html#build:;search:libnm_snapshot_reattach_unmanaged_ports_to_bridge

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
1.41.2-30986.copr.a4cf48f8bc.el9

How reproducible:
?

./test_run.sh libnm_snapshot_reattach_unmanaged_ports_to_bridge
Comment 2 Vladimir Benes 2022-09-14 14:28:32 UTC 
while I can run more than 20 attempts of the test with 1.41.1-30967.copr.5c3b553ea3.el9.x86_64 I am failing very soon with 1.41.1-30968.copr.0e0ac364a1.el9.x86_64

so https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/NetworkManager/NetworkManager/-/commit/0e0ac364a1901b3e5bb56da4b37bc706555e5214 looks suspicious!

Lubo, to you!
Comment 3 Vladimir Benes 2022-09-14 14:29:23 UTC 
btw I was able to fail the test after 60 attempts even with NetworkManager-1.36.0-5.el9_0.x86_64 :-(
Comment 4 Lubomir Rintel 2022-09-30 14:24:22 UTC 
<debug> [1663152490.8328] device[45d34e95fb71cce0] (portXa): ifindex: set ifindex 0 (old-l3cfg: c75e5c91bde4f990)
<debug> [1663152490.8328] device[3fa7cfc200be4e84] (portXc): master portXa with ifindex 0 appeared
<debug> [1663152490.8329] device[084bb6ac78acf885] (portXb): master portXa with ifindex 0 appeared

hmm, this is most certainly wrong
Comment 8 David Jaša 2023-08-10 13:25:03 UTC 
Marking as VERIFIED, running the scenario in a loop didn't result in a fail after 70 iterations...

version: NetworkManager-1.43.9-1.el9.x86_64
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.