Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.

RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.

Bug 2126622

Summary:	usbguard 1.0.0-10.el9 conflicts with itself
Product:	Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9	Reporter:	Milos Malik <mmalik>
Component:	usbguard	Assignee:	Attila Lakatos <alakatos>
Status:	CLOSED ERRATA	QA Contact:	Dalibor Pospíšil <dapospis>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:	Mirek Jahoda <mjahoda>
Priority:	medium
Version:	9.1	CC:	alakatos, casses1, dapospis, gfialova, mjahoda, qe-baseos-security, zfridric
Target Milestone:	rc	Keywords:	Triaged
Target Release:	---	Flags:	pm-rhel: mirror+
Hardware:	x86_64
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:	usbguard-1.0.0-13.el9	Doc Type:	Removed functionality
Doc Text:	.`usbguard` for i686 is no longer available The `usbguard` packages for AMD and Intel 32-bit architectures (i686) are no longer available in RHEL. With this change, the `usbguard` package conflict is removed as well.	Story Points:	---
Clone Of:	2105091	Environment:
Last Closed:	2023-05-09 07:48:17 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Milos Malik 2022-09-14 07:14:27 UTC

+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #2105091 +++

Description of problem:
usbguard conflicts with itself

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
usbguard-selinux-1.0.0-10.el9.noarch
usbguard-1.0.0-10.el9.x86_64
usbguard-dbus-1.0.0-10.el9.x86_64
usbguard-notifier-1.0.0-10.el9.x86_64
usbguard-tools-1.0.0-10.el9.x86_64

How reproducible:
simple

Steps to Reproduce:
1. install the usbguard packages on RHEL-9.1 machine
2. yum check

Actual results:
usbguard-1.0.0-10.el9.x86_64 has installed conflict "usbguard": usbguard-1.0.0-10.el9.x86_64
Error: Check discovered 1 problem(s)

Expected results:
 * no errors

Additional info:
# rpm -q usbguard --conflicts
usbguard
#

Comment 1 Attila Lakatos 2022-11-28 08:07:27 UTC

I propose the same AC(s) as for https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2105091 (rhel8 version of this bug).

Comment 2 Attila Lakatos 2022-11-28 11:20:56 UTC

Scratch-build: https://kojihub.stream.rdu2.redhat.com/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1622201

Comment 14 errata-xmlrpc 2023-05-09 07:48:17 UTC

Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory (usbguard bug fix and enhancement update), and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2023:2351