Description of problem (please be detailed as possible and provide log snippests): This is continuing from previoud BZ defect 2026342 as it was closed but the defect still exist. When the MG is run, in the noobaa-diagnostic logs, we still see few files with "zero size" and this is specific to ODF 4.11.1 release with MCG as Noobaa log file of noobaa-db-pg-0-init.log -rw-r--r-- root/root 687 2022-09-29 02:13 db-noobaa-db-pg-0-pvc-describe.txt -rw-r--r-- root/root 22883969 2022-09-29 02:13 noobaa-core-0-core.log -rw-r--r-- root/root 5869 2022-09-29 02:13 noobaa-core-0-pod-describe.txt -rw-r--r-- root/root 1472 2022-09-29 02:13 noobaa-db-pg-0-db.log -rw-r--r-- root/root 0 2022-09-29 02:13 noobaa-db-pg-0-init.log -rw-r--r-- root/root 217 2022-09-29 02:13 noobaa-db-pg-0-initialize-database.log -rw-r--r-- root/root 6041 2022-09-29 02:13 noobaa-db-pg-0-pod-describe.txt -rw-r--r-- root/root 7393749 2022-09-29 02:13 noobaa-default-backing-store-noobaa-pod-b1d19499-noobaa-agent.log -rw-r--r-- root/root 3563 2022-09-29 02:13 noobaa-default-backing-store-noobaa-pod-b1d19499-pod-describe.txt -rw-r--r-- root/root 767 2022-09-29 02:13 noobaa-default-backing-store-noobaa-pvc-b1d19499-pvc-describe.txt -rw-r--r-- root/root 480988 2022-09-29 02:13 noobaa-endpoint-68fdb67d97-dh8tm-endpoint.log -rw-r--r-- root/root 5752 2022-09-29 02:13 noobaa-endpoint-68fdb67d97-dh8tm-pod-describe.txt -rw-r--r-- root/root 492700 2022-09-29 02:13 noobaa-endpoint-68fdb67d97-fdf45-endpoint.log -rw-r--r-- root/root 5757 2022-09-29 02:13 noobaa-endpoint-68fdb67d97-fdf45-pod-describe.txt -rw-r--r-- root/root 585165 2022-09-29 02:13 noobaa-endpoint-68fdb67d97-qtx9k-endpoint.log -rw-r--r-- root/root 5752 2022-09-29 02:13 noobaa-endpoint-68fdb67d97-qtx9k-pod-describe.txt -rw-r--r-- root/root 1096 2022-09-29 02:13 noobaa-endpoint-scc-describe.txt -rw-r--r-- root/root 353 2022-09-29 02:13 noobaa-operator-6b4466545b-h97kw-noobaa-operator-previous.log -rw-r--r-- root/root 7415384 2022-09-29 02:13 noobaa-operator-6b4466545b-h97kw-noobaa-operator.log -rw-r--r-- root/root 6216 2022-09-29 02:13 noobaa-operator-6b4466545b-h97kw-pod-describe.txt -rw-r--r-- root/root 1085 2022-09-29 02:13 noobaa-scc-describe.txt Version of all relevant components (if applicable): oc get clusterversion NAME VERSION AVAILABLE PROGRESSING SINCE STATUS version 4.11.0 True False 43d Cluster version is 4.11.0 oc get csv -n openshift-storage NAME DISPLAY VERSION REPLACES PHASE mcg-operator.v4.11.1 NooBaa Operator 4.11.1 mcg-operator.v4.11.0 Succeeded metallb-operator.4.11.0-202209161807 MetalLB Operator 4.11.0-202209161807 Succeeded ocs-operator.v4.11.1 OpenShift Container Storage 4.11.1 ocs-operator.v4.11.0 Succeeded odf-csi-addons-operator.v4.11.1 CSI Addons 4.11.1 odf-csi-addons-operator.v4.11.0 Succeeded odf-operator.v4.11.1 OpenShift Data Foundation 4.11.1 odf-operator.v4.11.0 Succeeded We don't use the rook/CEPH and the rook-mon pod. oc get configmap -n openshift-storage NAME DATA AGE 4fd470de.openshift.io 0 46h ab76f4c9.openshift.io 0 46h csi-addons-manager-config 1 46h e8cd140a.openshift.io 0 46h kube-root-ca.crt 1 46h noobaa-config 3 46h noobaa-operator-lock 0 46h noobaa-postgres-config 1 46h noobaa-postgres-initdb-sh 1 46h odf-operator-manager-config 26 46h openshift-service-ca.crt 1 46h rook-ceph-operator-config 4 46h Does this issue impact your ability to continue to work with the product (please explain in detail what is the user impact)? User is impacted as the MG when requested from Customer would show an empty file and analysis would be difficult if we need to do any RCA Is there any workaround available to the best of your knowledge? NO Rate from 1 - 5 the complexity of the scenario you performed that caused this bug (1 - very simple, 5 - very complex)? 1 Can this issue reproducible? Should be , whoever deployed ODF-(MCG) Can this issue reproduce from the UI? If this is a regression, please provide more details to justify this: Steps to Reproduce: 1. Issue MG of ODF 4.11 (MCG option as use that only for Noobaa) 2. inspect the noobaa_diagnostics_*.tar.gz 3. Actual results: Expected results: Shouldn't have "zero file size" Additional info:
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 2131330 ***