The FDP team is no longer accepting new bugs in Bugzilla. Please report your issues under FDP project in Jira. Thanks.
Bug 2131897 - [OVN][DVR][VLAN] some FIP's are unreachable
Summary: [OVN][DVR][VLAN] some FIP's are unreachable
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux Fast Datapath
Classification: Red Hat
Component: ovn22.06
Version: FDP 22.B
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
urgent
high
Target Milestone: ---
: ---
Assignee: Ales Musil
QA Contact: Jianlin Shi
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2022-10-04 02:38 UTC by OVN Bot
Modified: 2022-11-03 00:31 UTC (History)
8 users (show)

Fixed In Version: ovn22.06-22.06.0-62.el8fdp
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2022-11-03 00:30:59 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Issue Tracker FD-2363 0 None None None 2022-10-13 16:45:47 UTC
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2022:7395 0 None None None 2022-11-03 00:31:04 UTC

Description OVN Bot 2022-10-04 02:38:09 UTC
This is an automatically-generated clone of issue https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2123837

Comment 3 Jianlin Shi 2022-10-17 03:28:14 UTC
run reproducer in https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2123837#c22 for several times, the issue occured:

+ ip netns exec vif0 ip addr add 192.168.20.10/24 dev vif0                                            
+ ip netns exec vif0 ping 192.168.20.1 -c 3                                                           
PING 192.168.20.1 (192.168.20.1) 56(84) bytes of data.                                                
                                                                                                      
--- 192.168.20.1 ping statistics ---                                                                  
3 packets transmitted, 0 received, 100% packet loss, time 2056ms                                      
                                                                                                      
[root@dell-per740-12 bz2123837]# ip netns exec vif0 ping 192.168.20.1                                 
PING 192.168.20.1 (192.168.20.1) 56(84) bytes of data.                                                
^C                                                                                                    
--- 192.168.20.1 ping statistics ---                                                                  
28 packets transmitted, 0 received, 100% packet loss, time 27656ms


[root@dell-per740-12 bz2123837]# rpm -qa | grep -E "openvswitch2.17|ovn22.06"                         
ovn22.06-central-22.06.0-59.el8fdp.x86_64                                                             
openvswitch2.17-2.17.0-58.el8fdp.x86_64                                                               
ovn22.06-22.06.0-59.el8fdp.x86_64                                                                     
ovn22.06-host-22.06.0-59.el8fdp.x86_64 

Verified on ovn22.06-64.el8:

+ ip netns exec vif0 ip addr add 192.168.20.10/24 dev vif0
+ ip netns exec vif0 ping 192.168.20.1 -c 3
PING 192.168.20.1 (192.168.20.1) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 192.168.20.1: icmp_seq=1 ttl=254 time=1044 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.20.1: icmp_seq=2 ttl=254 time=6.65 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.20.1: icmp_seq=3 ttl=254 time=0.478 ms

--- 192.168.20.1 ping statistics ---
3 packets transmitted, 3 received, 0% packet loss, time 2040ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.478/350.430/1044.163/490.549 ms, pipe 2
[root@dell-per740-12 bz2123837]# rpm -qa | grep -E "openvswitch2.17|ovn22.06"
ovn22.06-host-22.06.0-64.el8fdp.x86_64
openvswitch2.17-2.17.0-58.el8fdp.x86_64
ovn22.06-central-22.06.0-64.el8fdp.x86_64
ovn22.06-22.06.0-64.el8fdp.x86_64

Comment 5 errata-xmlrpc 2022-11-03 00:30:59 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory (ovn22.06), and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2022:7395


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.