Red Hat Satellite engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on Satellite to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "Satellite project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs will be migrated starting at the end of May. If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "Satellite project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/SAT-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.

Description of problem:
There is one more <th> tag, which creates a header for an empty column, that is not used.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:
always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Register host
2. Navigate to All hosts->$hostname->Content->Repository sets
3. Check DOM for the table, the number of header columns should be the same as the number of columns in rows

Actual results:
There is one more column in the header (th) compared to columns in rows (td).

Expected results:
The number of columns should be the same

Additional info:

Also happening on Satellite 6.13.

satellite-6.13.0-6.el8sat.noarch
foreman-3.5.1.14-1.el8sat.noarch
Red Hat Enterprise Linux release 8.7 (Ootpa)

Jeremy, 

Would this one be a duplicate of bug 2209037 ?

Thanks!

Yes, it appears so. I wasn't sure which one to mark as dup.

Considering 2209037 is already verified, I'll go ahead and close this one as a dupe of 2209037. If I misread the conversation, feel free to reopen.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 2209037 ***