Bug 21331 - up2date ignores actual version numbers
up2date ignores actual version numbers
Status: CLOSED NOTABUG
Product: Red Hat Linux
Classification: Retired
Component: up2date (Show other bugs)
7.0
i386 Linux
medium Severity medium
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Preston Brown
Aaron Brown
:
Depends On:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2000-11-25 15:39 EST by Need Real Name
Modified: 2007-04-18 12:30 EDT (History)
0 users

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2000-11-25 15:39:07 EST
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

  None (edit)
Description Need Real Name 2000-11-25 15:39:04 EST
I've upgraded several packages (such as sawfish) beyond those supplied with
RedHat7 or the updates ftp section.
Up2date now tells me that I should install a sawfish-0.32 package when I
have 0.33 installed already. I know I didn't use a RedHat produced package,
but up2date should still pay attention to the fact that I have.
Comment 1 Preston Brown 2000-11-28 14:42:34 EST
The red hat versions have higher "Epoch" versions than the packages you have
installed yourself, and epoch numbers get a higher weight than versions, so our
packages are considered newer.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.