This bug has been migrated to another issue tracking site. It has been closed here and may no longer be being monitored.

If you would like to get updates for this issue, or to participate in it, you may do so at Red Hat Issue Tracker .
Red Hat Satellite engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on Satellite to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "Satellite project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs will be migrated starting at the end of May. If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "Satellite project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/SAT-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.
Bug 2135787 - [RFE] Satellite and Anaconda are not in sync when deploying RHEL9: both keyfiles/snippets and ifcfg-xxx files are generated
Summary: [RFE] Satellite and Anaconda are not in sync when deploying RHEL9: both keyfi...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED MIGRATED
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Satellite
Classification: Red Hat
Component: Provisioning
Version: 6.11.3
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
urgent
urgent
Target Milestone: stream
Assignee: Shimon Shtein
QA Contact: Shweta Singh
URL:
Whiteboard:
: 2162348 2163010 2251473 (view as bug list)
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2022-10-18 12:31 UTC by Francisco Peralta
Modified: 2024-10-05 04:25 UTC (History)
19 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2024-06-06 12:46:58 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Foreman Issue Tracker 37367 0 Normal New Foreman and Anaconda are not in sync when deploying RHEL9: both keyfiles/snippets and ifcfg-xxx files are generated 2024-04-18 12:10:27 UTC
Red Hat Issue Tracker   SAT-15129 0 None Migrated None 2024-06-06 12:46:57 UTC
Red Hat Knowledge Base (Solution) 6996643 0 None None None 2023-02-06 01:59:18 UTC

Comment 18 Leos Stejskal 2023-11-21 08:33:23 UTC 
*** Bug 2163010 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 19 Leos Stejskal 2023-11-21 08:35:13 UTC 
*** Bug 2162348 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 20 Leos Stejskal 2023-11-21 08:47:59 UTC 
> Leos, is this something suitable for Shim when the 6.15 queue is done?

I believe it is, but don't want to speak on behalf of @sshtein.
It's a top priority and should be done as soon as we can.
Comment 21 Leos Stejskal 2023-11-28 12:07:21 UTC 
*** Bug 2251473 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 26 Eric Helms 2024-05-16 16:17:12 UTC 
Upstream bug assigned to sshtein
Comment 27 Eric Helms 2024-05-16 16:17:16 UTC 
Moving this bug to POST for triage into Satellite since the upstream issue https://projects.theforeman.org/issues/37367 has been resolved.
Comment 29 Eric Helms 2024-06-06 12:46:58 UTC 
This BZ has been automatically migrated to the issues.redhat.com Red Hat Issue Tracker. All future work related to this report will be managed there.

Due to differences in account names between systems, some fields were not replicated.  Be sure to add yourself to Jira issue's "Watchers" field to continue receiving updates and add others to the "Need Info From" field to continue requesting information.

To find the migrated issue, look in the "Links" section for a direct link to the new issue location. The issue key will have an icon of 2 footprints next to it, and begin with "SAT-" followed by an integer.  You can also find this issue by visiting https://issues.redhat.com/issues/?jql= and searching the "Bugzilla Bug" field for this BZ's number, e.g. a search like:

"Bugzilla Bug" = 1234567

In the event you have trouble locating or viewing this issue, you can file an issue by sending mail to rh-issues. You can also visit https://access.redhat.com/articles/7032570 for general account information.
Comment 30 Red Hat Bugzilla 2024-10-05 04:25:32 UTC 
The needinfo request[s] on this closed bug have been removed as they have been unresolved for 120 days
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.