Bug 213658 - Review Request: ibutils - Upstream OFED package to support InfiniBand hardware
Summary: Review Request: ibutils - Upstream OFED package to support InfiniBand hardware
Status: CLOSED NOTABUG
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review (Show other bugs)
(Show other bugs)
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends On: 246387
Blocks: FE-DEADREVIEW
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2006-11-02 14:20 UTC by Doug Ledford
Modified: 2008-10-01 18:40 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2008-10-01 18:40:49 UTC
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Doug Ledford 2006-11-02 14:20:23 UTC
The ibutils package is a collection of InfiniBand fabrid diagnostic tools.  It depends on the openib package.  The ibutils and openib packages are already in CVS and used in RHEL4 and RHEL5.  I would like to add it to Fedora Core Development (aka rawhide) and possibly to Fedora Core 6 as an update.

Comment 1 Jason Tibbitts 2007-06-29 01:37:27 UTC
Wow, this is an old one.  And after a quick glance it's easy to see why no
review has happened here: there are no packages to review.

Is this still relevant at all?  If so, please post some packages so somebody can
take a look.  If not, this ticket should be closed.

Comment 2 Doug Ledford 2007-06-29 03:18:46 UTC
There are packages that we've put together for RHEL.  They can be found at
http://people.redhat.com/dledford/Infiniband.  The latest OFED-1.2 packages have
just been placed there as well.  Obviously, the ibutils package is useless
without the rest of the infiniband stack (the openib package).  I haven't tried
to get this pushed through because the rest of the stack is done in one mondo
rpm that I didn't figure people would approve anyway (I think it should be split
up, but the OpenFabrics Alliance people make it one big RPM, and I follow them).

Comment 3 Patrice Dumas 2008-04-30 08:24:59 UTC
Please post a link to the spec file and the .src.rpm file you
want us to review.

Comment 4 Jason Tibbitts 2008-10-01 18:40:49 UTC
This has been in the NEEDINFO state for months with no response; closing.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.