Bugzilla will be upgraded to version 5.0 on a still to be determined date in the near future. The original upgrade date has been delayed.
Bug 213658 - Review Request: ibutils - Upstream OFED package to support InfiniBand hardware
Review Request: ibutils - Upstream OFED package to support InfiniBand hardware
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review (Show other bugs)
All Linux
medium Severity medium
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it
Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
Depends On: 246387
  Show dependency treegraph
Reported: 2006-11-02 09:20 EST by Doug Ledford
Modified: 2008-10-01 14:40 EDT (History)
3 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Last Closed: 2008-10-01 14:40:49 EDT
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---

Attachments (Terms of Use)

  None (edit)
Description Doug Ledford 2006-11-02 09:20:23 EST
The ibutils package is a collection of InfiniBand fabrid diagnostic tools.  It depends on the openib package.  The ibutils and openib packages are already in CVS and used in RHEL4 and RHEL5.  I would like to add it to Fedora Core Development (aka rawhide) and possibly to Fedora Core 6 as an update.
Comment 1 Jason Tibbitts 2007-06-28 21:37:27 EDT
Wow, this is an old one.  And after a quick glance it's easy to see why no
review has happened here: there are no packages to review.

Is this still relevant at all?  If so, please post some packages so somebody can
take a look.  If not, this ticket should be closed.
Comment 2 Doug Ledford 2007-06-28 23:18:46 EDT
There are packages that we've put together for RHEL.  They can be found at
http://people.redhat.com/dledford/Infiniband.  The latest OFED-1.2 packages have
just been placed there as well.  Obviously, the ibutils package is useless
without the rest of the infiniband stack (the openib package).  I haven't tried
to get this pushed through because the rest of the stack is done in one mondo
rpm that I didn't figure people would approve anyway (I think it should be split
up, but the OpenFabrics Alliance people make it one big RPM, and I follow them).
Comment 3 Patrice Dumas 2008-04-30 04:24:59 EDT
Please post a link to the spec file and the .src.rpm file you
want us to review.
Comment 4 Jason Tibbitts 2008-10-01 14:40:49 EDT
This has been in the NEEDINFO state for months with no response; closing.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.