Bug 2137793 - Update topolvm to use the new topolvm.io domain name
Summary: Update topolvm to use the new topolvm.io domain name
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat OpenShift Data Foundation
Classification: Red Hat Storage
Component: topolvm
Version: 4.12
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
high
high
Target Milestone: ---
: ODF 4.12.0
Assignee: N Balachandran
QA Contact: Aviad Polak
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2022-10-26 08:32 UTC by N Balachandran
Modified: 2023-08-09 17:03 UTC (History)
6 users (show)

Fixed In Version: 4.12.0-100
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2023-02-08 14:06:28 UTC
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description N Balachandran 2022-10-26 08:32:24 UTC
Description of problem (please be detailed as possible and provide log
snippests):

The topolvm project is changing the domain name from topolvm.cybozu.com to topolvm.io. 

Upstream PR:  https://github.com/topolvm/topolvm/pull/539


Why should we do this in 4.12?
The topolvm team will not provide an automated migration path from the old to the new name as there is a risk of data loss. 
This will affect the upgrade experience if we do not change to the new name for ODF 4.12. To allow for a seamless upgrade, we should update to the new name now.

Changes and risks:
Topolvm: 
- The PR is still being reviewed. The maintainer expects it to be merged in a few weeks and does not expect major changes. If we wait until it is merged upstream, we risk missing the dev freeze dates.
- CRDs and manifests. 
- Finalizers, labels, etc
- Code changes are mostly to determine which name to use based on an argument passed to the topolvm process. The argument is required only if you use to

LVMO changes:
- Change the LogicalVolume CRD and RBACs to point to the new topolvm domain name


Version of all relevant components (if applicable):


Does this issue impact your ability to continue to work with the product
(please explain in detail what is the user impact)?


Is there any workaround available to the best of your knowledge?


Rate from 1 - 5 the complexity of the scenario you performed that caused this
bug (1 - very simple, 5 - very complex)?


Can this issue reproducible?


Can this issue reproduce from the UI?


If this is a regression, please provide more details to justify this:


Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.


Actual results:


Expected results:


Additional info:

Comment 4 Mudit Agarwal 2022-10-31 03:08:52 UTC
Please attach the PR.

Comment 7 Aviad Polak 2022-11-20 14:50:31 UTC
with merge of this PR: https://github.com/red-hat-storage/ocs-ci/pull/6600 i think it safe to close this BZ


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.