The fakechroot is in Fedora and in EPEL 8: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1432505 Please branch and build fakechroot in epel9 as well.
fakechroot is more or less abandonware . I maintain fakechroot because could be used by pbuilder and debootstrap, nowadays I don't know if it is necessary. ATM, debbuild, debhelper, debootstrap, dpkg and pbuilder requires fakeroot and not fakechroot. If you justifies me that it is necessary or is better to have fakechroot, I'd appreciate it, because I'm not sure if it can be replaced Thank you
I use fakeroot and fakechroot for testing of rpm2swidtag (packaged in Fedora as swid-tools -- https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/swid-tools/): https://github.com/swidtags/rpm2swidtag/blob/master/test.sh#L55-L58. That tooling integrates with dnf and for testing it is useful to pretend to dnf that it running in a separate chroot, without having the full permissions to do so. Having it in EPEL 9 would make it easier to add the upstream tests on CentOS 9 Stream as well. It seems fakechroot-2.20.1-11.fc37.src.rpm compiles and work on CentOS 9 Stream fine.
FEDORA-EPEL-2022-e190e78980 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 9. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-e190e78980
FEDORA-EPEL-2022-e190e78980 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 testing repository. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-e190e78980 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.
FEDORA-EPEL-2022-e190e78980 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.