Bug 2138910 - Upgrade to Fedora 37 dont work because of webkit2gtk3-2.38.1-1.fc36.x86_64 and boost probleme
Summary: Upgrade to Fedora 37 dont work because of webkit2gtk3-2.38.1-1.fc36.x86_64 an...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: webkit2gtk3
Version: 36
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Linux
unspecified
high
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Michael Catanzaro
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard: AcceptedFreezeException
: 2138911 2139284 (view as bug list)
Depends On:
Blocks: F37FinalFreezeException
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2022-10-31 16:19 UTC by mryodatak
Modified: 2022-11-02 19:53 UTC (History)
7 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2022-11-02 19:53:25 UTC
Type: Bug
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description mryodatak 2022-10-31 16:19:02 UTC
Description of problem:


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1. On a fedora 36 workstation try to upgrade to Fedora 37 in CLI
2. sudo dnf system-upgrade download --releasever=37
3.

Actual results:
Erreur : 
 Problème 1: le paquet webkit2gtk3-2.38.1-1.fc36.x86_64 nécessite libicui18n.so.69()(64bit), mais aucun fournisseur ne peut être installé
  - le paquet webkit2gtk3-2.38.1-1.fc36.x86_64 nécessite libicuuc.so.69()(64bit), mais aucun fournisseur ne peut être installé
  - libicu-69.1-6.fc36.x86_64 n’appartient pas à un dépôt distupgrade
  - problème avec le paquet installé webkit2gtk3-2.38.1-1.fc36.x86_64
 Problème 2: le paquet boost-regex-1.78.0-9.fc37.x86_64 nécessite libicuuc.so.71()(64bit), mais aucun fournisseur ne peut être installé
  - le paquet boost-regex-1.78.0-9.fc37.x86_64 nécessite libicui18n.so.71()(64bit), mais aucun fournisseur ne peut être installé
  - le paquet boost-regex-1.78.0-9.fc37.x86_64 nécessite libicudata.so.71()(64bit), mais aucun fournisseur ne peut être installé
  - installation impossible à la fois de libicu-71.1-2.fc37.x86_64 et libicu-69.1-6.fc36.x86_64
  - problème avec le paquet installé boost-regex-1.76.0-12.fc36.x86_64
  - le paquet webkit2gtk3-jsc-2.38.1-1.fc36.x86_64 nécessite libicui18n.so.69()(64bit), mais aucun fournisseur ne peut être installé
  - le paquet webkit2gtk3-jsc-2.38.1-1.fc36.x86_64 nécessite libicuuc.so.69()(64bit), mais aucun fournisseur ne peut être installé
  - boost-regex-1.76.0-12.fc36.x86_64 n’appartient pas à un dépôt distupgrade
  - problème avec le paquet installé webkit2gtk3-jsc-2.38.1-1.fc36.x86_64
(essayez d’ajouter « --allowerasing » à la ligne de commande pour remplacer les paquets en conflit ou « --skip-broken » pour ignorer les paquets non installables)


Expected results:
Upgrade works

Additional info:

Comment 1 Michael Catanzaro 2022-10-31 16:45:26 UTC
The problem is the F37 package is behind the F36 package due to F37 freeze. It will remain that way until the F37 freeze is lifted, then when the F37 update moves from -testing to -stable the problem will go away.

Sorry, but that's just usual freeze troubles. I won't stop updating F36 in the meantime.

Comment 2 Michael Catanzaro 2022-10-31 16:54:21 UTC
*** Bug 2138911 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 3 Michael Catanzaro 2022-10-31 16:55:26 UTC
(And there will be another update in a few days, so even if somebody requests a freeze exception to avoid this, it will just break again.)

Comment 4 Giovanni Tirloni 2022-11-01 14:17:19 UTC
For anyone caught in this situation, downgrade the FC36 package before attempting the upgrade.

It's unfortunate this happens but not much can be done short of freezing FC36 while FC37 is frozen, which would probably be a major change.

Comment 5 Michael Catanzaro 2022-11-01 14:27:33 UTC
We *could* approve freeze exceptions for all webkitgtk updates in F37 (including the forthcoming 2.38.2 update which will soon obsolete the 2.38.1 update), which would fix this.

Comment 6 Michael Catanzaro 2022-11-02 14:22:38 UTC
*** Bug 2139284 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 7 Adam Williamson 2022-11-02 17:32:00 UTC
We could also, as discussed on the other bug, extend the bound on the obsoletes to e.g. "< 3". As I read it, the policy does not preclude this.

Comment 8 Adam Williamson 2022-11-02 17:33:27 UTC
Re-opening to at least discuss the options for the RC I'm about to request.

Comment 9 Fedora Update System 2022-11-02 19:04:11 UTC
FEDORA-2022-3bc81cae3b has been submitted as an update to Fedora 37. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-3bc81cae3b

Comment 10 Adam Williamson 2022-11-02 19:23:37 UTC
+3 in https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/blocker-review/issue/1005 , marking accepted FE.

Comment 11 Fedora Update System 2022-11-02 19:53:25 UTC
FEDORA-2022-3bc81cae3b has been pushed to the Fedora 37 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.