Bug 21427 - ocamldebug is actually ocamlrun
ocamldebug is actually ocamlrun
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Product: Red Hat Powertools
Classification: Retired
Component: ocaml (Show other bugs)
7.0
i386 Linux
medium Severity medium
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Tim Powers
:
Depends On:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2000-11-28 10:20 EST by Yaron Minsky
Modified: 2008-05-01 11:37 EDT (History)
0 users

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2000-11-29 18:04:59 EST
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---


Attachments (Terms of Use)

  None (edit)
Description Yaron Minsky 2000-11-28 10:20:46 EST
Oddly, the ocaml RPM is weirdly compiled, so that ocamldebug looks like a
version of ocamlrun (although it is not the same file as the ocamlrun
executbale included.)  To verify, just try to feed it on eof the
command-line options for ocamldebug, and you'll see it doesn't work.

I'm not sure what the problem is exactly.  I donwloaded pristine sources
and compiled them with only the memmove patch, and that ocamldebug worked
fine. The pristine sources do not compile fully without the memmove patch
I haven't tried the included sources, or the sparc patch.

A quick of correctness.  ocamldebug should give the following re

snapdragon: SOURCES $ ocamldebug
No program name specified
Usage: ocamldebug [options] <program> [arguments]
Options are:
  -I <dir>  Add <dir> to the list of include directories
  -s <filename>  Set the name of the communication socket
  -c <count>  Set max number of checkpoints kept
  -cd <dir>  Change working directory
  -emacs For running the debugger under emacs

If it doesn't (for instance, it says something about missing a bytecode
file) then there's a problem.
Comment 1 Yaron Minsky 2000-11-28 10:23:44 EST
I just checked --- the ocaml tar file contained on the RPM is in fact the
pristine sources.  So the problem is either the sparc patch or somehow in the
install.  I suspect it's the sparc patch.
Comment 2 Tim Powers 2000-11-28 12:54:30 EST
It's the same file, only stripped. Unstripped it has all the flags.

Tim
Comment 3 Tim Powers 2000-11-28 13:03:35 EST
After a quick look at some of the other binaries, none of them can be stripped.
If they are, the exact smae behavior is exibited. I am working on an errata
release for this now.

Tim
Comment 4 Tim Powers 2000-11-29 18:04:56 EST
An errata has been released for this ( RHBA-2000:119-02 ). Thanks for the report.

Tim

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.