Spec URL : https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/sshil/python-phply/fedora-37-x86_64/05046323-python-phply/python-phply.spec SRPM URL : https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/sshil/python-phply/fedora-37-x86_64/05046323-python-phply/python-phply-1.2.5-1.fc37.src.rpm Description of problem:phply is a parser for the PHP programming language written using PLY, a Lex/YACC-style parser generator toolkit for Python
Issues: ======= - Good to use upstream project URL as URL: https://github.com/viraptor/phply - Package must not depend on deprecated() packages. Note: python3-nose is deprecated, you must not depend on it. See: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/deprecating-packages/ ==> See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/DeprecateNose#Detailed_Description You may ask upstream to change the test runner from nose library. You also don't need below deprecated macro line in SPEC file %{?python_provide:%python_provide python%{python3_pkgversion}-%{pypi_name}} - License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found: "BSD 3-Clause License", "Unknown or generated", "*No copyright* [generated file]". 21 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/test/2144002-python-phply/licensecheck.txt ==> license is "BSD-3-Clause" as per new SPDX expression format - Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. Note: Dirs in package are owned also by: /usr/lib/python3.11/site- packages/tests(python3-flatpak-module-tools), /usr/lib/python3.11/site-packages/tests/__pycache__(python3-flatpak- module-tools) ==> I don't think we need tests directory content installed by this binary package. Running successfully tests in %check is sufficient. Drop below from %file %{python3_sitelib}/tests rpmlint on generated rpm files gives output as python3-phply.noarch: W: files-duplicate /usr/lib/python3.11/site-packages/phply-1.2.5-py3.11.egg-info/not-zip-safe /usr/lib/python3.11/site-packages/phply-1.2.5-py3.11.egg-info/dependency_links.txt ==> This can be ignored as there are no contents in both files but they still got marked as duplicate python-phply.src: E: description-line-too-long phply is a parser for the PHP programming language written using PLY, a Lex/YACC-style parser generator toolkit for Python. python3-phply.noarch: E: description-line-too-long phply is a parser for the PHP programming language written using PLY, a Lex/YACC-style parser generator toolkit for Python. ==> per line in %description should be limited to 80 characters only
Changes done in spec file. Here is the latest spec file and srpm link Spec File: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/sshil/python-phply/fedora-37-x86_64/05061575-python-phply/python-phply.spec srpm: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/sshil/python-phply/fedora-37-x86_64/05061575-python-phply/python-phply-1.2.5-1.fc37.src.rpm
Fixed all above issues in below updated SRPM Spec File: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/sshil/python-phply/fedora-37-x86_64/05061650-python-phply/python-phply.spec SRPM: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/sshil/python-phply/fedora-37-x86_64/05061650-python-phply/python-phply-1.2.5-2.fc37.src.rpm
Few more fixes needed 1) The BuildRequires: python3-pip is not needed 2) Add back %check as %check %py3_check_import %{pypi_name} You should report upstream about replacing nose library in the testsuite run. Also, See https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Python/#_running_tests which says if you don't run upstream test for some reason at least run %py3_check_import
Fixed all above issues in below updated SRPM Spec File: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/sshil/python-phply/fedora-37-x86_64/05068019-python-phply/python-phply.spec SRPM: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/sshil/python-phply/fedora-37-x86_64/05068019-python-phply/python-phply-1.2.5-3.fc37.src.rpm
Fixed all above issues in below updated SRPM and resubmitted Spec File: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/sshil/python-phply/fedora-37-x86_64/05068336-python-phply/python-phply.spec SRPM: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/sshil/python-phply/fedora-37-x86_64/05068336-python-phply/python-phply-1.2.5-3.fc37.src.rpm
Package Review ============== Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated [ ] = Manual review needed ===== MUST items ===== Generic: [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found: "Unknown or generated", "BSD 3-Clause License". 21 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/test/2144002-python-phply/licensecheck.txt [x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [-]: Development files must be in a -devel package [-]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: Package does not generate any conflict. [x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. [-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size (~1MB) or number of files. Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 1 files. [x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: Package installs properly. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %license. [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x]: Package must own all directories that it creates. [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Dist tag is present. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: Package does not use a name that already exists. [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local Python: [x]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build process. [x]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should provide egg info. [x]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python [x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel [x]: Packages MUST NOT have dependencies (either build-time or runtime) on packages named with the unversioned python- prefix unless no properly versioned package exists. Dependencies on Python packages instead MUST use names beginning with python2- or python3- as appropriate. [x]: Python packages must not contain %{pythonX_site(lib|arch)}/* in %files [x]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep ===== SHOULD items ===== Generic: [-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments). [?]: Package functions as described. [x]: Latest version is packaged. [x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-]: Sources are verified with gpgverify first in %prep if upstream publishes signatures. Note: gpgverify is not used. [x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [x]: %check is present and all tests pass. [x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files. [x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [x]: Buildroot is not present [x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) [x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin. [x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file [x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag [x]: SourceX is a working URL. [x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified. ===== EXTRA items ===== Generic: [x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM. Rpmlint ------- Checking: python3-phply-1.2.5-3.fc38.noarch.rpm python-phply-1.2.5-3.fc38.src.rpm =================================================================== rpmlint session starts =================================================================== rpmlint: 2.4.0 configuration: /usr/lib/python3.11/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-legacy-licenses.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-spdx-licenses.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml rpmlintrc: [PosixPath('/tmp/tmp3h4wltnd')] checks: 31, packages: 2 python3-phply.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary phplex python3-phply.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary phpparse python3-phply.noarch: W: files-duplicate /usr/lib/python3.11/site-packages/phply-1.2.5-py3.11.egg-info/not-zip-safe /usr/lib/python3.11/site-packages/phply-1.2.5-py3.11.egg-info/dependency_links.txt ==================================== 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings, 0 badness; has taken 0.4 s ==================================== Rpmlint (installed packages) ---------------------------- ============================ rpmlint session starts ============================ rpmlint: 2.4.0 configuration: /usr/lib/python3.11/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-legacy-licenses.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-spdx-licenses.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml checks: 31, packages: 1 python3-phply.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary phplex python3-phply.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary phpparse python3-phply.noarch: W: files-duplicate /usr/lib/python3.11/site-packages/phply-1.2.5-py3.11.egg-info/not-zip-safe /usr/lib/python3.11/site-packages/phply-1.2.5-py3.11.egg-info/dependency_links.txt 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings, 0 badness; has taken 0.0 s Source checksums ---------------- https://github.com/viraptor/phply/archive/refs/tags/1.2.5.tar.gz#/phply-1.2.5.tar.gz : CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package : 12edede84df48b9cfb00373723a8700744c1b61748cdbb567b380eedb9f1bb43 CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : 12edede84df48b9cfb00373723a8700744c1b61748cdbb567b380eedb9f1bb43 Requires -------- python3-phply (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): /usr/bin/python3 python(abi) python3.11dist(ply) Provides -------- python3-phply: python-phply python3-phply python3.11-phply python3.11dist(phply) python3dist(phply) Generated by fedora-review 0.9.0 (6761b6c) last change: 2022-08-23 Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -b 2144002 -m fedora-rawhide-x86_64 Buildroot used: fedora-rawhide-x86_64 Active plugins: Generic, Python, Shell-api Disabled plugins: Java, R, Ocaml, Perl, C/C++, Haskell, fonts, PHP, SugarActivity Disabled flags: EPEL6, EPEL7, DISTTAG, BATCH, EXARCH APPROVED.
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-phply
FEDORA-2022-1c01288ec0 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 37. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-1c01288ec0
FEDORA-2022-77cac592ef has been submitted as an update to Fedora 36. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-77cac592ef
FEDORA-2022-77cac592ef has been pushed to the Fedora 36 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --refresh --advisory=FEDORA-2022-77cac592ef \*` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-77cac592ef See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.
FEDORA-2022-1c01288ec0 has been pushed to the Fedora 37 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --refresh --advisory=FEDORA-2022-1c01288ec0 \*` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-1c01288ec0 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.
FEDORA-2022-77cac592ef has been pushed to the Fedora 36 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
FEDORA-2022-1c01288ec0 has been pushed to the Fedora 37 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.