Fedora Account System
Red Hat Associate
Red Hat Customer
Please branch and build libmspub in epel9. If you do not wish to maintain libmspub in epel9, or do not think you will be able to do this in a timely manner, the EPEL Packagers SIG would be happy to be a co-maintainer of the package; please add the epel-packagers-sig group through https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/libmspub/addgroup and grant it commit access, or collaborator access on epel* branches.
For me, a rebuild of libmspub-0.1.4-21.fc37 on epel9 worked.
This package is already present in RHEL 9 / CentOS Stream 9.
Btw, it would be good if you give some reason the next time you ask for inclusion of a package in EPEL. The implied "it's not there"--which is wrong in this case anyway--is IMHO not a sufficient justification for the extra maintenance work (and it doesn't matter who ends up doing the maintenance).
I'm sorry, but I can not find libmspub-devel to build scribus. I'm sorry, I thought blocking bug #2144650 would be clear enough.
Ah, this is one of the RHEL peculiarities. I've filed bug #2144762 to get libmspub-devel added to CRB 9 (and thus later to RHEL 9). For the mean time, I'm changing this RHBZ to request the short-term solution as per https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/epel/epel-policy-missing-sub-packages/#short_term to hopefully get scribus before RHEL 9.2 into EPEL 9. Please let me know if you are not interested in the short-term solution, then I'll work on this myself.
FEDORA-EPEL-2022-48f4de81f6 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 9. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-48f4de81f6
FEDORA-EPEL-2022-48f4de81f6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 testing repository. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-48f4de81f6 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.
(In reply to Robert Scheck from comment #4) > I'm sorry, but I can not find libmspub-devel to build scribus. I'm sorry, I > thought blocking bug #2144650 would be clear enough. It would if I had actually noticed the link. But since I was convinced the bug was invalid, I didn't spend much time looking around...
(In reply to David Tardon from comment #8) > It would if I had actually noticed the link. But since I was convinced the bug was invalid, I didn't spend much time looking around... I see. Even these RHEL peculiarities (not publishing all -devel packages in general) are quite annoying, we already got sorted them out for scribus (short and long term).
FEDORA-EPEL-2022-48f4de81f6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.