Spec URL: https://github.com/amoralej/packages/raw/main/python-binary-memcached.spec SRPM URL: https://github.com/amoralej/packages/blob/main/python-binary-memcached-0.31.1-1.fc38.src.rpm?raw=true Description: Upstream project: https://github.com/jaysonsantos/python-binary-memcached A pure python module (thread safe) to access memcached via it’s binary with SASL auth support. The main purpose of this module it to be able to communicate with memcached using binary protocol and support authentication, so it can work with Heroku for example. Fedora Account System Username: amoralej
Currently, it's failing to install in rawhide because the initial build of python-uhashring is not yet included in the last fedora compose. I'm afraid we will need to wait a bit for it but it'd be great if we can start reviewing it.
I've updated the spec to vix an issue with mistune BR declaration (it was messing because there are two packages in fedora python3-mistune and python3-mistune08). It should be possible to run fedora-review now.
SRPM URL: https://github.com/amoralej/packages/raw/main/python-binary-memcached-0.31.1-1.fc38.src.rpm Spec URL: https://github.com/amoralej/packages/raw/main/python-binary-memcached.spec
The package looks good, but there is still an issue with mistune package. in fact, there are two packages: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-mistune08 https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-mistune Package Review ============== Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated [ ] = Manual review needed Issues: ======= - Package must not depend on deprecated() packages. Note: python3-mistune08 is deprecated, you must not depend on it. See: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging- guidelines/deprecating-packages/ ===== MUST items ===== Generic: [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found: "Unknown or generated", "MIT License", "*No copyright* MIT License". 64 files have unknown license. [x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [-]: Development files must be in a -devel package [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: Package does not generate any conflict. [x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. [-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size (~1MB) or number of files. Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 0 files. [x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: Package installs properly. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %license. [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x]: Package must own all directories that it creates. [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Dist tag is present. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: Package does not use a name that already exists. [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local Python: [-]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build process. [x]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should provide egg info. [x]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python [x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel [x]: Packages MUST NOT have dependencies (either build-time or runtime) on packages named with the unversioned python- prefix unless no properly versioned package exists. Dependencies on Python packages instead MUST use names beginning with python2- or python3- as appropriate. [x]: Python packages must not contain %{pythonX_site(lib|arch)}/* in %files [x]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep ===== SHOULD items ===== Generic: [-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments). [x]: Package functions as described. [x]: Latest version is packaged. [x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-]: Sources are verified with gpgverify first in %prep if upstream publishes signatures. Note: gpgverify is not used. [x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [x]: %check is present and all tests pass. [?]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files. [x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [x]: Buildroot is not present [x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) [x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin. [x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file [x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag [x]: SourceX is a working URL. [x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified. ===== EXTRA items ===== Generic: [x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM. Rpmlint ------- Cannot parse rpmlint output: Rpmlint (installed packages) ---------------------------- ============================ rpmlint session starts ============================ rpmlint: 2.4.0 configuration: /usr/lib/python3.11/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-legacy-licenses.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-spdx-licenses.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml checks: 31, packages: 1 python3-binary-memcached.noarch: E: description-line-too-long A pure python module (thread safe) to access memcached via it’s binary with SASL auth support. python3-binary-memcached.noarch: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/doc/python3-binary-memcached/README.rst docs/intro.rst 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 1 warnings, 1 badness; has taken 0.1 s Source checksums ---------------- https://github.com/jaysonsantos/python-binary-memcached/archive/refs/tags/v0.31.1.tar.gz : CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package : 7f12d1bcb072ce63b81f786a7762ada707e8849d1ae84761a0146a1d276de70e CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : 7f12d1bcb072ce63b81f786a7762ada707e8849d1ae84761a0146a1d276de70e Requires -------- python3-binary-memcached (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): memcached python(abi) python3.11dist(six) python3.11dist(uhashring) Provides -------- python3-binary-memcached: python-binary-memcached python3-binary-memcached python3.11-binary-memcached python3.11dist(python-binary-memcached) python3dist(python-binary-memcached) Generated by fedora-review 0.9.0 (6761b6c) last change: 2022-08-23 Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -b 2145124 Buildroot used: fedora-rawhide-x86_64 Active plugins: Shell-api, Generic, Python Disabled plugins: R, PHP, fonts, Haskell, Ocaml, SugarActivity, Java, C/C++, Perl Disabled flags: EPEL6, EPEL7, DISTTAG, BATCH, EXARCH
Actually the problem with mistune is not directly coming from python-binary-memcached but from m2r. binary-memcached is using m2r to build in setup.py: https://github.com/jaysonsantos/python-binary-memcached/blob/a506ff24e44f581fd178c102a1154a115fb71487/setup.py#L5 m2r is requiring mistune<2 as version 2 broke compatibility and it seems m2r didn't fix compatibility with it: https://github.com/miyakogi/m2r/blob/b49e3363eaa0a2ea9d2c26a53c30cd06969c7833/setup.py#L19 So unfortunatelly we are tied to use old mistune until this is fixed in upstream project on patched in fedora python-m2r package: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-m2r/c/f9a026d6779ea8829ed0e1904c690c8106a845f0?branch=rawhide Once this is fixed, we'll inherit the solution as I'm not setting max version in BR.
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-binary-memcached
Package is built and in rawhide tag https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=2092788