Bug 2147446 - RFE - Add backup task that collects more instance items
Summary: RFE - Add backup task that collects more instance items
Keywords:
Status: ON_QA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Directory Server
Classification: Red Hat
Component: 389-ds-base
Version: 12.2
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
high
unspecified
Target Milestone: DS12.3
: dirsrv-12.3
Assignee: mreynolds
QA Contact: LDAP QA Team
Evgenia Martynyuk
URL:
Whiteboard: sync-to-jira
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2022-11-23 21:56 UTC by mreynolds
Modified: 2023-08-11 14:04 UTC (History)
8 users (show)

Fixed In Version: redhat-ds-12-9030020230711000312-1674d57
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed:
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Issue Tracker IDMDS-2649 0 None None None 2022-11-23 22:01:03 UTC
Red Hat Issue Tracker IDMDS-3083 0 None None None 2023-06-01 10:17:07 UTC
Red Hat Issue Tracker IDMDS-3508 0 None None None 2023-08-07 08:08:03 UTC

Description mreynolds 2022-11-23 21:56:34 UTC 
Description of problem:

It would be nice to have a backup task that backs up the database, and... config, certdb, and schema
Comment 1 mreynolds 2022-11-23 21:58:26 UTC 
Upstream ticket:

https://github.com/389ds/389-ds-base/issues/2562
Comment 2 Eddy Resnick 2022-11-24 08:33:04 UTC 
See customer case https://access.redhat.com/support/cases/#/case/03369816

Specifically - useful to export the site specific data that are not past of the standard DS installation.
Comment 3 Eddy Resnick 2022-12-05 12:00:57 UTC 
I just tried restoring using ldapadd an instance from a backed up LDIF made by dsconf backend export. 
The ACIs are not added.
This backup/restore facility should be able to create and restore an instance in a single command.
Comment 9 mreynolds 2023-08-11 14:04:53 UTC 
Here is the design doc for this new feature:

https://www.port389.org/docs/389ds/design/expanded-backup-design.html
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.