Bug 2147460 - [CEE][cephfs] cephfs-mirror service kept getting permission denied errors
Summary: [CEE][cephfs] cephfs-mirror service kept getting permission denied errors
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Ceph Storage
Classification: Red Hat Storage
Component: CephFS
Version: 5.2
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Linux
unspecified
medium
Target Milestone: ---
: 6.0
Assignee: Milind Changire
QA Contact: Hemanth Kumar
Eliska
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: 2126050 2158286 2175175
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2022-11-23 23:13 UTC by Scott Nipp
Modified: 2024-02-14 10:57 UTC (History)
11 users (show)

Fixed In Version: ceph-17.2.5-1.el9cp
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
.The CephFS now has the correct directory access Previously, directory access was denied even to the UID of 0 due to incorrect Discretionary Access Control (DAC) management. With this fix, directory access is allowed to UID 0 even if the actual permissions for the directory user, group, and others are not permissible for UID 0. This results in the correct Ceph File System (CephFS) behavior for directory access to UID 0 by effectively granting superuser privileges.
Clone Of:
: 2152849 2158286 2175175 (view as bug list)
Environment:
Last Closed: 2023-03-20 18:59:40 UTC
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Issue Tracker RHCEPH-5687 0 None None None 2022-11-23 23:15:18 UTC
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2023:1360 0 None None None 2023-03-20 19:00:50 UTC

Internal Links: 2175175

Comment 11 Ken Dreyer (Red Hat) 2023-01-04 16:35:51 UTC
https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/46595 shipped in the v17.2.4 upstream release, so it's been downstream for a while

Comment 21 errata-xmlrpc 2023-03-20 18:59:40 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory (Red Hat Ceph Storage 6.0 Bug Fix update), and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2023:1360


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.