Bug 2147599 - maxima killed by SIGSEGV
Summary: maxima killed by SIGSEGV
Keywords:
Status: NEW
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: maxima
Version: 37
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Linux
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Rex Dieter
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2022-11-24 11:10 UTC by René Kraneis
Modified: 2023-07-01 22:55 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: ---
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed:
Type: Bug
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description René Kraneis 2022-11-24 11:10:38 UTC
Description of problem:
maxima killed by SIGSEGV

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
5.45.1-3.fc37.x86_64

How reproducible:
always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. run `maxima`

Actual results:
Segmentation fault (core dumped)

Expected results:
A running maxima session.

Additional info:
I was unable to report the bug automatically:

--- Running report_uReport ---
Server responded with an error: 'Element 'stacktrace' is invalid: List element is invalid: Element 'frames' is invalid: List element is invalid: Element 'file_name' is missing'
('report_uReport' exited with 1)


Installing a different maxima runtime (I tested maxima-runtime-clisp, the default seems to be sbcl), and running with `maxima -l clisp` succeeds without a segfault.

Comment 1 René Kraneis 2022-11-24 11:27:04 UTC
After reading https://maxima.sourceforge.io/lisp.html I tried out just running `rmaxima`--which succeeded.

  $ rmaxima
  Maxima 5.45.1 https://maxima.sourceforge.io
  using Lisp SBCL 2.0.1-8.fc36
  Distributed under the GNU Public License. See the file COPYING.
  Dedicated to the memory of William Schelter.
  The function bug_report() provides bug reporting information.


(SBCL for F36?)

Listing available runtimes still makes it crash:

  $ rmaxima --list-avail
  
  rlwrap: warning: maxima crashed, killed by SIGSEGV (core dumped).
  rlwrap itself has not crashed, but for transparency,
  it will now kill itself with the same signal
  
  warnings can be silenced by the --no-warnings (-n) option



But it stopped working after running the following session:

  $ rmaxima
  Maxima 5.45.1 https://maxima.sourceforge.io
  using Lisp SBCL 2.0.1-8.fc36
  Distributed under the GNU Public License. See the file COPYING.
  Dedicated to the memory of William Schelter.
  The function bug_report() provides bug reporting information.
  (%i1) 1+1   1+1
  
  Maxima encountered a Lisp error:
  
  parser: end of file while scanning expression.
  
  Automatically continuing.
  To enable the Lisp debugger set *debugger-hook* to nil.



Now all I get is:
  $ rmaxima
  
  rlwrap: warning: maxima crashed, killed by SIGSEGV (core dumped).
  rlwrap itself has not crashed, but for transparency,
  it will now kill itself with the same signal
  
  warnings can be silenced by the --no-warnings (-n) option

Comment 2 René Kraneis 2022-11-24 11:28:37 UTC
More data points: running in a fresh F37 toolbox yields

  $ maxima
  Maxima 5.45.1 https://maxima.sourceforge.io
  using Lisp SBCL 2.0.1-8.fc36
  Distributed under the GNU Public License. See the file COPYING.
  Dedicated to the memory of William Schelter.
  The function bug_report() provides bug reporting information.

(again, SBCL claims to be compiled for F36?)

No crashes after running a similar session as in my other comment for `rmaxima`.


My installed F37 (for which I created the original bug report) has been initially installed as F37-beta.

Comment 3 René Kraneis 2022-11-24 11:51:09 UTC
(In reply to René Kraneis from comment #1)
> Now all I get is:
>   $ rmaxima
>   
>   rlwrap: warning: maxima crashed, killed by SIGSEGV (core dumped).
>   rlwrap itself has not crashed, but for transparency,
>   it will now kill itself with the same signal
>   
>   warnings can be silenced by the --no-warnings (-n) option

I randomly do get a working session:

  $ rmaxima
  Maxima 5.45.1 https://maxima.sourceforge.io
  using Lisp SBCL 2.0.1-8.fc36
  Distributed under the GNU Public License. See the file COPYING.
  Dedicated to the memory of William Schelter.
  The function bug_report() provides bug reporting information.


Statistics for the nth run of `rmaxima`, that did not lead to SIGSEGV:
sum:   101
min:     1
max:    20
median:  3.5
average: 5.6

Some fuzzing around shows, that the same is true for just running `maxima`, it was just by chance, that `rmaxima` succeeded on first try.

I have no idea, what's going on and don't see this behavior in my F37 toolbox.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.