Bug 2149050 - Addresses configured at different order than specified at state [rhel-8.4.0.z]
Summary: Addresses configured at different order than specified at state [rhel-8.4.0.z]
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8
Classification: Red Hat
Component: nmstate
Version: 8.6
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Linux
unspecified
urgent
Target Milestone: rc
: ---
Assignee: Fernando F. Mancera
QA Contact: Mingyu Shi
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On: 2132570
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2022-11-28 17:10 UTC by RHEL Program Management Team
Modified: 2023-01-30 14:45 UTC (History)
8 users (show)

Fixed In Version: nmstate-1.0.2-21.el8_4
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of: 2132570
Environment:
Last Closed: 2023-01-30 14:45:51 UTC
Type: ---
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Issue Tracker NMT-208 0 None None None 2023-01-30 07:36:00 UTC
Red Hat Issue Tracker RHELPLAN-140706 0 None None None 2022-11-28 17:14:56 UTC
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2023:0501 0 None None None 2023-01-30 14:45:53 UTC

Comment 4 Mingyu Shi 2022-12-13 04:28:42 UTC 
Verified with:
nmstate-1.0.2-21.el8_4.noarch
nispor-1.0.1-5.el8_4.x86_64
NetworkManager-1.30.0-13.el8_4.x86_64
DISTRO=RHEL-8.4.0-updates-20211026.0
Comment 5 Mingyu Shi 2022-12-13 05:34:41 UTC 
Notice it only guarantees the order configured by nmstate. For example, if an interface is not managed and configured multiple IPs via `ip address` command, `nmstatectl show` may show different order(kernel provides)
Comment 7 Gris Ge 2022-12-21 06:47:18 UTC 
No extra patch required for nmstate. For the IPv4 address missorder after reapply(change existing interface) is caused by limitation of kernel API on IPv4. Since the order between subnet does not actually matters in any use case, I would suggest you to test on IP address ordering in the same subnet especially the `secondary` flag is corrected added to IPv4 address. For IPv6 address, they should be strictly ordered.
Comment 8 Mingyu Shi 2022-12-22 06:59:49 UTC 
Used one subnet for ipv4, kept ipv6 part unchanged, all passed.
Comment 12 errata-xmlrpc 2023-01-30 14:45:51 UTC 
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory (nmstate bug fix and enhancement update), and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2023:0501
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.