Bug 214935 - [Symantec RHEL4.5 feat] svclib_filesystem does not contain vxfs entry for remounting
[Symantec RHEL4.5 feat] svclib_filesystem does not contain vxfs entry for rem...
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Product: Red Hat Cluster Suite
Classification: Red Hat
Component: rgmanager (Show other bugs)
4
All Linux
medium Severity urgent
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Marek Grac
David Lawrence
: Documentation, EasyFix, FutureFeature
Depends On:
Blocks: 196060 214936
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2006-11-09 23:48 EST by Andrius Benokraitis
Modified: 2015-07-14 00:25 EDT (History)
6 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version: RHBA-2007:0149
Doc Type: Enhancement
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2007-05-15 12:48:08 EDT
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---


Attachments (Terms of Use)

  None (edit)
Description Andrius Benokraitis 2006-11-09 23:48:05 EST
Description of problem:
A customer a client would like to run RHCS 3.0 and Veritas Filesystem 4.0
(vxfs).  They would like to have Cluster Suite manage the failing over of the
filesystem, but when they choose the vxfs filesystem, nothing happens.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): ALL RHEL 3/4/5

How reproducible: Always

Steps to Reproduce:
(a) start clumanager on both nodes
(b) disable the service
(c) edit the configuration and manually change the file system type to
vxfs & increment the config_viewnumber
(d) run 'service clumanager reload' 
  
Actual results:
Without an edited configuration file
(/usr/lib/clumanager/services/svclib_filesystem), nothing.

Expected results:
mount -t vxfs

Additional info:


Index: svclib_filesystem
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/devel/clumanager/src/services/svclib_filesystem,v
retrieving revision 1.21
diff -u -r1.21 svclib_filesystem
--- svclib_filesystem    20 Jul 2006 13:31:14 -0000    1.21
+++ svclib_filesystem    10 Oct 2006 14:32:50 -0000
@@ -427,6 +427,7 @@
         jfs)      typeset fsck_needed="" ;;
         xfs)      typeset fsck_needed="" ;;
         gfs)      typeset fsck_needed="" ;;
+       vxfs)      typeset fsck_needed="" ;;
         ext2)     typeset fsck_needed=yes ;;
         minix)    typeset fsck_needed=yes ;;
         vfat)     typeset fsck_needed=yes ;;
Comment 2 Andrius Benokraitis 2007-01-11 12:54:42 EST
Marek, what's the status of this? Has this been committed?
Comment 3 Andrius Benokraitis 2007-02-13 10:05:59 EST
Marek, what's the status of this? Has this been committed?
Comment 4 Lon Hohberger 2007-02-13 10:42:52 EST
diff -u -r1.1.2.12 clusterfs.sh
--- clusterfs.sh        27 Nov 2006 22:12:27 -0000      1.1.2.12
+++ clusterfs.sh        13 Feb 2007 15:42:31 -0000
@@ -276,7 +276,7 @@
        [ -z "$OCF_RESKEY_fstype" ] && return $OCF_SUCCESS
 
        case $OCF_RESKEY_fstype in
-       gfs)
+       gfs|vxfs)
                return $OCF_SUCCESS
                ;;
        *)
Comment 5 Lon Hohberger 2007-02-13 10:45:09 EST
Actually, that's wrong.
Comment 6 Lon Hohberger 2007-02-13 10:46:29 EST
diff -u -r1.4.2.19 fs.sh
--- fs.sh       13 Dec 2006 18:28:41 -0000      1.4.2.19
+++ fs.sh       13 Feb 2007 15:45:55 -0000
@@ -320,7 +320,7 @@
        [ -z "$OCF_RESKEY_fstype" ] && return 0
 
        case $OCF_RESKEY_fstype in
-       ext2|ext3|jfs|xfs|reiserfs|vfat|tmpfs)
+       ext2|ext3|jfs|xfs|reiserfs|vfat|tmpfs|vxfs)
                return 0
                ;;
        *)
Comment 7 Lon Hohberger 2007-02-13 10:51:59 EST
Patch agsinst fs.sh applied to RHEL4 branch
Comment 10 Jay Turner 2007-05-15 13:47:26 EDT
Fix confirmed with rgmanager-1.9.68-1.
Comment 11 Jay Turner 2007-05-15 13:48:10 EDT
An advisory has been issued which should help the problem
described in this bug report. This report is therefore being
closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information
on the solution and/or where to find the updated files,
please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report
if the solution does not work for you.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2007-0148.html

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.