Bug 2150984 - Build Fedora Silverblue & Kinoite using rpm-ostree unified core mode
Summary: Build Fedora Silverblue & Kinoite using rpm-ostree unified core mode
Keywords:
Status: POST
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Changes Tracking
Version: 38
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Timothée Ravier
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: F38Changes 2150982
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2022-12-05 18:58 UTC by Ben Cotton
Modified: 2023-02-08 17:24 UTC (History)
4 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed:
Type: ---


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Ben Cotton 2022-12-05 18:58:54 UTC
This is a tracking bug for Change: Build Fedora Silverblue & Kinoite using rpm-ostree unified core mode
For more details, see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/FedoraSilverblueUnifiedCore

rpm-ostree upstream development is focusing on the "unified core" mode and the previous mode is being deprecated. Fedora Silverblue and Fedora Kinoite are currently building using the old mode and we've wanted to move over for a while. The main advantage of the unified core mode is that it is stricter and safer, while enabling some post processing steps to happen during or after the image build.

If you encounter a bug related to this Change, please do not comment here. Instead create a new bug and set it to block this bug.

Comment 1 Ben Cotton 2023-02-07 14:27:33 UTC
Today we reached the Code Complete (Testable) milestone on the F38 schedule: https://fedorapeople.org/groups/schedule/f-38/f-38-key-tasks.html

At this time, all F38 Changes should be complete enough to be testable. You can indicate this by setting this tracker to the MODIFIED status. If the Change is 100% code complete, you can set the tracker to ON_QA. If you need to defer this Change to F39, please NEEDINFO me.

Changes that have not reached at least the MODIFIED status will be given to FESCo for evaluation of contingency plans.

Comment 2 Timothée Ravier 2023-02-08 17:24:02 UTC
This is not yet testable in Rawhide but we're still trying to make that happen.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.