Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because
the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.
RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.
DescriptionKarthik Sundaravel
2022-12-20 09:40:27 UTC
Description of problem:
Apply the below template using nmstatectl
{
"route-rules": {
"config": [
{
"family": "ipv4",
"iif": "eno3",
"route-table": "200"
},
{
"ip-from": "192.0.2.0/24",
"route-table": "200"
},
{
"action": "blackhole",
"ip-from": "172.19.40.0/24",
"route-table": "200"
},
{
"action": "unreachable",
"iif": "eno3",
"ip-from": "192.168.1.0/24"
},
{
"family": "ipv4",
"iif": "eno4",
"route-table": "201"
},
{
"ip-from": "10.0.2.0/24",
"route-table": "200"
}
]
}
}
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
nmstatectl 2.2.2
nmcli tool, version 1.39.10-1.el9
Actual results:
[root@dell-r640-oss-14 ~]# nmstatectl apply nm_route_rule.yaml
[2022-12-20T09:21:51Z INFO nmstate::nm::show] Got unsupported interface type generic: lo, ignoring
[2022-12-20T09:21:51Z INFO nmstate::query_apply::net_state] Ignoring kernel interface lo
[2022-12-20T09:21:51Z ERROR nmstate::net_state] InvalidArgument: Route table 254 for route rule is not defined by any routes
NmstateError: InvalidArgument: Route table 254 for route rule is not defined by any routes
Expected results:
The route rules shall be applied successfully. All these rules could be applied via ip rule command otherwise.
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.
For information on the advisory (nmstate bug fix and enhancement update), and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.
If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2023:2190
Description of problem: Apply the below template using nmstatectl { "route-rules": { "config": [ { "family": "ipv4", "iif": "eno3", "route-table": "200" }, { "ip-from": "192.0.2.0/24", "route-table": "200" }, { "action": "blackhole", "ip-from": "172.19.40.0/24", "route-table": "200" }, { "action": "unreachable", "iif": "eno3", "ip-from": "192.168.1.0/24" }, { "family": "ipv4", "iif": "eno4", "route-table": "201" }, { "ip-from": "10.0.2.0/24", "route-table": "200" } ] } } Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): nmstatectl 2.2.2 nmcli tool, version 1.39.10-1.el9 Actual results: [root@dell-r640-oss-14 ~]# nmstatectl apply nm_route_rule.yaml [2022-12-20T09:21:51Z INFO nmstate::nm::show] Got unsupported interface type generic: lo, ignoring [2022-12-20T09:21:51Z INFO nmstate::query_apply::net_state] Ignoring kernel interface lo [2022-12-20T09:21:51Z ERROR nmstate::net_state] InvalidArgument: Route table 254 for route rule is not defined by any routes NmstateError: InvalidArgument: Route table 254 for route rule is not defined by any routes Expected results: The route rules shall be applied successfully. All these rules could be applied via ip rule command otherwise.