Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.
RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.

Bug 2155910

Summary: usbguard does not save a rule if RuleFile is not defined
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9 Reporter: Dalibor Pospíšil <dapospis>
Component: usbguardAssignee: Attila Lakatos <alakatos>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Dalibor Pospíšil <dapospis>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact: Petr Hybl <phybl>
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 9.2CC: dapospis, gfialova, jafiala, phybl
Target Milestone: rcKeywords: AutoVerified, Triaged
Target Release: ---Flags: pm-rhel: mirror+
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: usbguard-1.0.0-15.el9 Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
.USBGuard saves rules even if RuleFile is not defined Previously, if the `RuleFolder` configuration directive in USBGuard was set but `RuleFile` was not, the rule set could not be changed. With this update, you can now change the rule set even if RuleFolder is set but RuleFile is not. As a result, you can modify the permanent policy in USBGuard to permanently save newly added rules.
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
: 2159413 (view as bug list) Environment:
Last Closed: 2023-05-09 07:48:17 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 2159413    

Description Dalibor Pospíšil 2022-12-22 21:24:45 UTC
Description of problem:
usbguard does not save a rule if RuleFile is not defined eventhough RuleFolder is defined and there is a file in it

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
usbguard-1.0.0-9.el9

How reproducible:
100%

Steps to Reproduce:
1. remove / comment out the RuleFile in the usbguard-daemon.conf
2. make sure the RuleFolder is correctly set and there's at least one rule file in the folder
3. start the daemon
4. try to add a rule `usbguard append-rule 'allow with-interface { 08:00:00 07:06:00 }'`

Actual results:
no rule is saved into a file in rules.d

Expected results:
the rule is saved into a file in rules.d

Comment 3 Attila Lakatos 2023-01-06 13:17:36 UTC
Scratch-build: https://kojihub.stream.rdu2.redhat.com/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1753247

Comment 12 errata-xmlrpc 2023-05-09 07:48:17 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory (usbguard bug fix and enhancement update), and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2023:2351