Red Hat Bugzilla – Bug 215627
mga: recursive heavyweight lock with dri
Last modified: 2009-01-09 02:01:10 EST
Description of problem: X is hanging with [drm:drm_lock_take] *ERROR* 1 holds heavyweight lock. Works fine with DRI disabled. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): xorg-x11-drivers-7.1-3 xorg-x11-drv-mga-1.4.2-1.fc6 kernel-2.6.18-1.2798.fc6 (and others) How reproducible: Every time. Steps to Reproduce: 1. Reboot 2. ratpoison and mythfrontend both start automatically on this machine Actual results: X hangs during mythtv startup. Proceeds ok if mythtv is not started. Only a kill -9 will stop X. Expected results: Should not hang. Additional info: This has was working fine on a fully updated FC5 system, only change was upgrade to FC6. Video card is a Matrox G550. From /var/log/messages: 21:28:45 kernel: [drm] Initialized mga 3.2.1 20051102 on minor 0 21:28:45 kernel: agpgart: Found an AGP 3.0 compliant device at 0000:00:00.0. 21:28:45 kernel: agpgart: Device is in legacy mode, falling back to 2.x 21:28:45 kernel: agpgart: Putting AGP V2 device at 0000:00:00.0 into 4x mode 21:28:45 kernel: agpgart: Putting AGP V2 device at 0000:01:00.0 into 4x mode 21:28:45 kernel: [drm] Initialized card for AGP DMA. 21:29:11 kernel: [drm:drm_lock_take] *ERROR* 1 holds heavyweight lock 21:29:14 last message repeated 159 times Backtrace from hung X process: #0 0x000000349a6c6267 in ioctl () from /lib64/libc.so.6 #1 0x00002aaaac02f987 in drmGetLock () from /usr/lib64/xorg/modules/linux/libdrm.so #2 0x00002aaaabe28f1b in DRILock () from /usr/lib64/xorg/modules/extensions/libdri.so #3 0x00002aaaabe291b2 in DRIClipNotify () from /usr/lib64/xorg/modules/extensions/libdri.so #4 0x000000000054e2e5 in compClipNotify () #5 0x00000000004d6ef2 in miShapedWindowIn () #6 0x00000000004d7660 in miValidateTree () #7 0x00000000004dd9cd in miMoveWindow () #8 0x000000000054efcb in compMoveWindow () #9 0x0000000000437bf6 in ConfigureWindow () #10 0x0000000000449516 in ProcConfigureWindow () #11 0x0000000000449c9a in Dispatch () #12 0x00000000004325d5 in main () A strace of the hung X process gives lots of these: ioctl(8, 0x4008642a, 0x7fff3c2e9e40) = ? ERESTARTSYS (To be restarted) In case it helps I've attached the strace from mythtv as well.
Created attachment 141190 [details] strace from mythfrontend
Thanks for the bug report. We have reviewed the information you have provided above, and there is some additional information we require that will be helpful in our diagnosis of this issue. Please attach your X server config file (/etc/X11/xorg.conf) and X server log file (/var/log/Xorg.*.log) to the bug report as individual uncompressed file attachments using the bugzilla file attachment link below. We will review this issue again once you've had a chance to attach this information. Thanks in advance.
Created attachment 141947 [details] X configuration file
Created attachment 141948 [details] Log file from X on a run where it hangs Added xorg.conf and Xorg log with dri enabled -> X hung when mythfrontend was starting.
Still in NEEDINFO - should switch to ASSIGNED?
Is this still an issue with xorg-x11-drv-mga 1.4.5 ?
Yep, still the same: [drm:drm_lock_take] *ERROR* 1 holds heavyweight lock xorg-x11-drv-mga-1.4.5-2.fc6 2.6.19-1.2911.fc6 Any ideas what's up, or what else I can try?
Still broken on Fedora 8. xorg-x11-drv-mga-1.4.6.1-6.fc8.x86_64 kernel-2.6.23.1-49.fc8.x86_64 I'd really like to track this down but have no idea where to start. Please give me some suggestions on how to debug this.
Based on the date this bug was created, it appears to have been reported against rawhide during the development of a Fedora release that is no longer maintained. In order to refocus our efforts as a project we are flagging all of the open bugs for releases which are no longer maintained. If this bug remains in NEEDINFO thirty (30) days from now, we will automatically close it. If you can reproduce this bug in a maintained Fedora version (7, 8, or rawhide), please change this bug to the respective version and change the status to ASSIGNED. (If you're unable to change the bug's version or status, add a comment to the bug and someone will change it for you.) Thanks for your help, and we apologize again that we haven't handled these issues to this point. The process we're following is outlined here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/F9CleanUp We will be following the process here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping to ensure this doesn't happen again.
Hey, follow the process sure, but I already stated in comment #8 that this is still broken in Fedora 8.
This message is a reminder that Fedora 8 is nearing its end of life. Approximately 30 (thirty) days from now Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora 8. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. At that time this bug will be closed as WONTFIX if it remains open with a Fedora 'version' of '8'. Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' to a later Fedora version prior to Fedora 8's end of life. Bug Reporter: Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we may not be able to fix it before Fedora 8 is end of life. If you would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version of Fedora please change the 'version' of this bug to the applicable version. If you are unable to change the version, please add a comment here and someone will do it for you. Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes bugs or makes them obsolete. The process we are following is described here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping
Fedora 8 changed to end-of-life (EOL) status on 2009-01-07. Fedora 8 is no longer maintained, which means that it will not receive any further security or bug fix updates. As a result we are closing this bug. If you can reproduce this bug against a currently maintained version of Fedora please feel free to reopen this bug against that version. Thank you for reporting this bug and we are sorry it could not be fixed.