rpm -qp --requires anaconda-runtime-10.1.1.46-1.i386.rpm libxml2-python python rpm-python >= 4.2-0.61 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 ...but buildinstall blows chunks if rhpl isn't there Traceback (most recent call last): File "<string>", line 1, in ? ImportError: No module named rhpl.keyboard_models /tmp/treedir.24014/instimage/usr/lib/anaconda-runtime/getkeymaps: line 45: loadkeys: command not found
While we're on the subject, it looks like kdb is required as well (at least on some arches). Making images... Running: /tmp/treedir.16914/instimage/usr/lib/anaconda-runtime/getkeymaps i386 /tmp/keymaps-i386.25856 /tmp/treedir.16914/instimage find: /lib/kbd/keymaps/i386: No such file or directory find: /lib/kbd/keymaps/i386: No such file or directory ...
...and dosfstools Cleaning up images /mnt/redhat/devel/mikem/trees/RHEL4-U5-re20061115.1/i386/i386-global/buildinstall.tree.16900/mk-images.i386: line 196: mkdosfs: command not found /mnt/redhat/devel/mikem/trees/RHEL4-U5-re20061115.1/i386/i386-global/images/diskboot.img: This doesn't look like a FAT filesystem /mnt/redhat/devel/mikem/trees/RHEL4-U5-re20061115.1/i386/i386-global/images/diskboot.img: Sector sizes other than 512 not supported mount: you must specify the filesystem type umount2: Invalid argument
anaconda-runtime intentionally has absolutely minimal requirements to avoid imposing requirements on people wanting to generate their own hdlists with genhdlist.
(In reply to comment #6) > anaconda-runtime intentionally has absolutely minimal requirements to avoid > imposing requirements on people wanting to generate their own hdlists with > genhdlist. That's for the RHEL4 world, but is this something we should change for Fedora and RHEL5? Add those deps to the anaconda-runtime package?
requested by Jams Antill
Anaconda in RHEL4 already has dosfstools and rhpl in the requirements. I this still an issue in the current builds?
long since worked around on my end.