Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.
RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.

Bug 2157758

Summary: Firefox release in CentOS Stream 9 is more than 2 weeks older than in RHEL
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9 Reporter: TomO <orlik3000>
Component: distributionAssignee: RHEL Program Management <pm-rhel>
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE QA Contact: Release Test Team <release-test-team-automation>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: CentOS StreamCC: asamalik, bstinson, carl, jkaluza, jwboyer, tpopela
Target Milestone: rcFlags: pm-rhel: mirror+
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2023-01-12 13:54:55 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description TomO 2023-01-02 18:31:24 UTC
Description of problem:

CentOS Stream 9 still has Firefox ESR 102.5.0 as the latest available version in repo, while RHEL (and even Alma) has the latest 102.6.0.
It has been released for RHEL on Dec 15h as per https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2022:9065.
Looking at Koji (https://kojihub.stream.centos.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=328), version 102.6.0 is already built for Stream, but for some reasons it is not released yet.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
firefox-102.6.0-1.el9

How reproducible:
always

Steps to Reproduce:
CentOS Stream repo has "firefox-102.5.0-1.el9.x86_64.rpm" as the latest:
https://mirror.stream.centos.org/9-stream/AppStream/x86_64/os/Packages/

RHEL & Alma already have "firefox-102.6.0-1.el9_1.x86_64.rpm":
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2022:9065
http://repo.almalinux.org/almalinux/9.1/AppStream/x86_64/os/Packages/

Expected results:
CentOS Stream 9 repo should have firefox-102.6.0-1.el9 released.

Comment 1 Tomas Popela 2023-01-03 07:17:19 UTC
(In reply to TomO from comment #0)
> Looking at Koji
> (https://kojihub.stream.centos.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=328), version
> 102.6.0 is already built for Stream, but for some reasons it is not released
> yet.

Moving to distribution as we can't do anything else (we've already done the builds) here AFAIK.

Comment 3 Adam Samalik 2023-01-09 14:22:01 UTC
It's in -pending now, the latest production compose (just finished) picked it up, it'll be in the mirrors later today.

Comment 5 TomO 2023-01-11 22:44:15 UTC
Thank you, looks like it is fixed.