RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.
Bug 2157798 - Prepare for the next quarterly OpenJDK upstream release (2023-01, 11.0.18) [rhel-9] [rhel-9.1.0.z]
Summary: Prepare for the next quarterly OpenJDK upstream release (2023-01, 11.0.18) [r...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9
Classification: Red Hat
Component: java-11-openjdk
Version: 9.0
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: rc
: ---
Assignee: Andrew John Hughes
QA Contact: OpenJDK QA
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On: 2150197
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2023-01-03 01:39 UTC by RHEL Program Management Team
Modified: 2023-03-28 15:16 UTC (History)
5 users (show)

Fixed In Version: java-11-openjdk-11.0.18.0.9-0.2.ea.el9_1
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of: 2150197
Environment:
Last Closed: 2023-01-18 10:22:38 UTC
Type: ---
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Issue Tracker RHELPLAN-143509 0 None None None 2023-01-03 01:42:58 UTC
Red Hat Product Errata RHSA-2023:0202 0 None None None 2023-01-18 10:22:47 UTC

Comment 7 errata-xmlrpc 2023-01-18 10:22:38 UTC 
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory (Moderate: java-11-openjdk security and bug fix update), and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2023:0202
Comment 8 Simeon Andreev 2023-03-20 16:58:04 UTC 
Hi,

my team is in the process of updating to RHEL 9 and OpenJDK 11.0.18. We noticed there are 2 sets of RPMs for this JDK version:


    https://access.redhat.com/downloads/content/java-11-openjdk/11.0.18.0.10-1.el9_0/x86_64/fd431d51/package-changelog
    https://access.redhat.com/downloads/content/java-11-openjdk/11.0.18.0.10-2.el9_1/x86_64/fd431d51/package-changelog

Could anyone clarify what the difference is? From the changelog its not clear what changed between the two.

Best regards and thanks,
Simeon
Comment 10 Andrew John Hughes 2023-03-28 15:02:22 UTC 
(In reply to Simeon Andreev from comment #8)
> Hi,
> 
> my team is in the process of updating to RHEL 9 and OpenJDK 11.0.18. We
> noticed there are 2 sets of RPMs for this JDK version:
> 
> 
>    
> https://access.redhat.com/downloads/content/java-11-openjdk/11.0.18.0.10-1.
> el9_0/x86_64/fd431d51/package-changelog
>    
> https://access.redhat.com/downloads/content/java-11-openjdk/11.0.18.0.10-2.
> el9_1/x86_64/fd431d51/package-changelog
> 
> Could anyone clarify what the difference is? From the changelog its not
> clear what changed between the two.
> 
> Best regards and thanks,
> Simeon

They should be near-identical. The only difference is one was built on RHEL 9.0 and one was built on RHEL 9.1. Your RHEL installation should just pick up whichever matches the minor RHEL version you're using.

We are actually in the process of migrating away from having all these builds to try and reduce the costs in terms of build time and testing, so this duplication may disappear in future.
Comment 11 Simeon Andreev 2023-03-28 15:16:39 UTC 
Alright, thank you for the info!
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.