Bug 21588 - please declare undeclared ports in /etc/services
please declare undeclared ports in /etc/services
Status: CLOSED NOTABUG
Product: Red Hat Linux
Classification: Retired
Component: setup (Show other bugs)
6.2
i386 Linux
medium Severity medium
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Bill Nottingham
Dale Lovelace
:
Depends On:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2000-12-01 10:45 EST by Joe Harrington
Modified: 2014-03-16 22:17 EDT (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2000-12-01 11:35:54 EST
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---


Attachments (Terms of Use)

  None (edit)
Description Joe Harrington 2000-12-01 10:45:35 EST
Recently there was a (n erroneous) report of hacking on my machine.  In
checking for activity, I found ports 1024 and 1032 in use.  These turned
out to be gnome-session and gnome-name-service, but this wasn't declared in
/etc/services.  It took a while to figure out what was active on those
ports, as telnetting to them gave binary garbage or nothing.  Please
declare the use of ports in /etc/services.  In trying to figure out what
these were, I found a thread on a security mailing list wondering what they
were as well, though they didn't figure it out.

Thanks,

--jh--
Comment 1 Havoc Pennington 2000-12-01 11:35:51 EST
Reassigning to the package containing /etc/services. I'm not sure /etc/services
normally contains user apps that open ports though, perhaps it's just systemwide
services.
Comment 2 Bill Nottingham 2000-12-01 11:43:25 EST
/etc/services is for standard registered ports (ftp, ssh, and the like.)

The things you mention like gnome-name-service are just allocated to the
first available port. Hence, you can't really list any defined ports for
them.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.