Bug 215893 - system-config-lvm not aware of uninitialized software RAID
Summary: system-config-lvm not aware of uninitialized software RAID
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED WONTFIX
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: system-config-lvm
Version: 6
Hardware: i386
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Jim Parsons
QA Contact: Jim Parsons
URL:
Whiteboard: bzcl34nup
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2006-11-16 09:32 UTC by Laurent GAUTROT
Modified: 2008-05-06 16:50 UTC (History)
4 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2008-05-06 16:50:26 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Laurent GAUTROT 2006-11-16 09:32:16 UTC
Request for enhancement about system-config-lvm

I'd like to initialize a software RAID from system-config-lvm, but I can't.

If the md has previously been initialized by pvcreate, it is displayed in the list.

It would be nice if the step of initialization for RAID was available in this
application.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

system-config-lvm 1.0.18

Steps to Reproduce:
  
% dd if=/dev/zero of=/tmp/md0-1 bs=100M count=1
1+0 enregistrements lus
1+0 enregistrements écrits
104857600 octets (105 MB) copiés, 0,308893 seconde, 339 MB/s
% dd if=/dev/zero of=/tmp/md0-2 bs=100M count=1
1+0 enregistrements lus
1+0 enregistrements écrits
104857600 octets (105 MB) copiés, 0,446697 seconde, 235 MB/s

% sudo losetup /dev/loop1 /tmp/md0-1
% sudo losetup /dev/loop2 /tmp/md0-2
% sudo mdadm -C /dev/md0 -l 1 -n 2 /dev/loop{1,2}
mdadm: array /dev/md0 started.
% cat /proc/mdstat
Personalities : [raid1] 
md0 : active raid1 loop2[1] loop1[0]
      102336 blocks [2/2] [UU]
      
unused devices: <none>
% system-config-lvm

Actual results:

At that time you won't see the uninitialized RAID

Expected results:

To see it, obviously

Comment 1 Bug Zapper 2008-04-04 04:43:33 UTC
Fedora apologizes that these issues have not been resolved yet. We're
sorry it's taken so long for your bug to be properly triaged and acted
on. We appreciate the time you took to report this issue and want to
make sure no important bugs slip through the cracks.

If you're currently running a version of Fedora Core between 1 and 6,
please note that Fedora no longer maintains these releases. We strongly
encourage you to upgrade to a current Fedora release. In order to
refocus our efforts as a project we are flagging all of the open bugs
for releases which are no longer maintained and closing them.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/LifeCycle/EOL

If this bug is still open against Fedora Core 1 through 6, thirty days
from now, it will be closed 'WONTFIX'. If you can reporduce this bug in
the latest Fedora version, please change to the respective version. If
you are unable to do this, please add a comment to this bug requesting
the change.

Thanks for your help, and we apologize again that we haven't handled
these issues to this point.

The process we are following is outlined here:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/F9CleanUp

We will be following the process here:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping to ensure this
doesn't happen again.

And if you'd like to join the bug triage team to help make things
better, check out http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers

Comment 2 Bug Zapper 2008-05-06 16:50:24 UTC
This bug is open for a Fedora version that is no longer maintained and
will not be fixed by Fedora. Therefore we are closing this bug.

If you can reproduce this bug against a currently maintained version of
Fedora please feel free to reopen thus bug against that version.

Thank you for reporting this bug and we are sorry it could not be fixed.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.