Spec URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/aekoroglu/fedora/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/05288903-python-pyftpdlib/python-pyftpdlib.spec SRPM Url: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/aekoroglu/fedora/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/05288903-python-pyftpdlib/python-pyftpdlib-1.5.7-1.fc38.src.rpm Description: Python FTP server library provides a high-level portable interface to easily write very efficient, scalable and asynchronous FTP servers with Python. It is the most complete RFC-959 FTP server implementation available for Python programming language.
Copr build: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/5290358 (succeeded) Review template: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2164342-python-pyftpdlib/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/05290358-python-pyftpdlib/fedora-review/review.txt Please take a look if any issues were found. --- This comment was created by the fedora-review-service https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service
The only issue on my side is python3-pyftpdlib.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary ftpbench Please, could you add man pages for ftpbench? I think it would be ok to generate them with help2man. Thank you
Yeah sure :) SPEC Url: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/aekoroglu/fedora/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/05307531-python-pyftpdlib/python-pyftpdlib.spec SRPM Url: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/aekoroglu/fedora/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/05307531-python-pyftpdlib/python-pyftpdlib-1.5.7-1.fc38.src.rpm
Created attachment 1940574 [details] The .spec file difference from Copr build 5290358 to 5307543
Copr build: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/5307543 (succeeded) Review template: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2164342-python-pyftpdlib/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/05307543-python-pyftpdlib/fedora-review/review.txt Please take a look if any issues were found. --- This comment was created by the fedora-review-service https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service
I tested it and it's good to go. There are no differences in my rpmlint than one mentioned in #c5. You can proceed with the next steps to unretire the package.
FEDORA-2023-e9b7221e78 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 37. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-e9b7221e78
FEDORA-2023-73c88d3686 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 36. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-73c88d3686
FEDORA-2023-e9b7221e78 has been pushed to the Fedora 37 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing --refresh --advisory=FEDORA-2023-e9b7221e78` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-e9b7221e78 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.
FEDORA-2023-73c88d3686 has been pushed to the Fedora 36 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing --refresh --advisory=FEDORA-2023-73c88d3686` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-73c88d3686 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.
FEDORA-2023-e9b7221e78 has been pushed to the Fedora 37 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
FEDORA-2023-73c88d3686 has been pushed to the Fedora 36 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.