Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.
Red Hat Satellite engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on Satellite to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "Satellite project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs will be migrated starting at the end of May. If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "Satellite project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/SAT-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.

Bug 2165838

Summary: Loading of some js and css assets takes too much time
Product: Red Hat Satellite Reporter: Roman Plevka <rplevka>
Component: BrandingAssignee: Maria <magaphon>
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE QA Contact: Cole Higgins <chiggins>
Severity: high Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 6.13.0CC: egolov, ehelms, sshtein
Target Milestone: UnspecifiedKeywords: Regression
Target Release: Unused   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2023-02-09 14:31:04 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Attachments:
Description Flags
grafana - histograms per template none

Description Roman Plevka 2023-01-31 09:05:25 UTC
Created attachment 1941244 [details]
grafana - histograms per template

Description of problem:
This is a regression from 6.12.

There is a really noticeable speed degradation of loading of some assets from browser.
This happens on loading of any page.

In my sample i can identify e.g.
/assets/application-4da828d15ff65dcf5db03e8a04f05444b8da72e7c948ba383af19ab1c2d67e97.css,
/webpack/foreman-vendor.bundle-v10.1.7-production-57ed7676cc22ce47f0a6.js,
...
but it's probably not the same files all over.


I've updated httpd conf LogFormat to append the request response time in the logs.
I've spawned satellite machines in the lab for each of the last 3 snaps + a recent 6.12 for comparison.

The screenshot of the histograms from grafana can be found in the attachments.

comparing to 6.12, it is very noticeable that there is some problem with loading of the assets - sometimes the asset takes as much as 2mins (!) to load.

I haven't tried older 6.13 snaps, so can't tell when exactly this got introduced


How reproducible:
always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. spawn 6.13-8.0 satellite
2. navigate to the login page (or any other)
3. observe the time it takes to load the page completely
4. use dev tools to see that in a timeline

Actual results:
really slow UI

Comment 1 Evgeni Golov 2023-02-01 09:45:16 UTC
this might be a duplicate of https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2166244

Comment 2 Brad Buckingham 2023-02-02 15:30:44 UTC
Hi Roman,

Do you agree that this is a duplicate of the bug in comment 1?  If so, can we close this one?   Thanks!

Comment 3 Roman Plevka 2023-02-07 12:21:51 UTC
(In reply to Brad Buckingham from comment #2)
> Hi Roman,
> 
> Do you agree that this is a duplicate of the bug in comment 1?  If so, can
> we close this one?   Thanks!

Hi Brad, it might be but I'm unable to confirm it.

Comment 4 Eric Helms 2023-02-09 14:31:04 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 2166244 ***