Spec URL: http://rpm.greysector.net/extras/arpack.spec SRPM URL: http://rpm.greysector.net/extras/arpack-2.1-1.src.rpm Description: ARPACK is a collection of Fortran77 subroutines designed to solve large scale eigenvalue problems. The package is designed to compute a few eigenvalues and corresponding eigenvectors of a general n by n matrix A. It is most appropriate for large sparse or structured matrices A where structured means that a matrix-vector product w <- Av requires order n rather than the usual order n**2 floating point operations. This software is based upon an algorithmic variant of the Arnoldi process called the Implicitly Restarted Arnoldi Method (IRAM).
God: + Source package was not complainted by rpmlint. * Local build works fine. * Rpmlint is quited on binary packages. * Local install/uninstall workds ok. * Tarball matches with upstream. * Mock build works fine. Bad: - Devel package should contains some documentation for developers. I thins, that the stuff on /usr/doc/arpack-2.1/EXAMPLES shold be in the developement package. - Rpmlint complaints on installed package: rpmlint arpack W: arpack undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libarpack.so.2.1 etime_ W: arpack undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libarpack.so.2.1 slamch_ W: arpack undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libarpack.so.2.1 cgemv_ W: arpack undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libarpack.so.2.1 cscal_ --- A lot of simular lines ---
(In reply to comment #1) > Bad: > - Devel package should contains some documentation for developers. > I thins, that the stuff on /usr/doc/arpack-2.1/EXAMPLES shold be in > the developement package. Done, new specfile: http://rpm.greysector.net/extras/arpack.spec (SRPM unchanged) > - Rpmlint complaints on installed package: It doesn't here (FC6). > rpmlint arpack > W: arpack undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libarpack.so.2.1 etime_ > W: arpack undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libarpack.so.2.1 slamch_ > W: arpack undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libarpack.so.2.1 cgemv_ > W: arpack undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libarpack.so.2.1 cscal_ > --- A lot of simular lines --- I have no idea what this is about.
It seems to be a duplicate of #214967 so it should certainly be better to add a comment on that report. The symbols look like lapack symbols.
Scratch that, I have an idea now. Stay tuned.
Aw, crap. I forgot about #214967.
OK, non-weak symbol issue fixed. http://rpm.greysector.net/extras/arpack.spec http://rpm.greysector.net/extras/arpack-2.1-2.src.rpm I will ask Axel if he would consider letting me (co-)maintain this.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 214967 ***