Bug 21692 – Anaconda dies with EATA driver + BOOTNET.IMG

Bug 21692 - Anaconda dies with EATA driver + BOOTNET.IMG

Summary:	Anaconda dies with EATA driver + BOOTNET.IMG

Status:	CLOSED NOTABUG

Aliases:	None

Product:	Red Hat Linux
Classification:	Retired
Component:	anaconda (Show other bugs)
Sub Component:
Version:	7.0
Hardware:	i386 Linux

Priority	medium Severity medium
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Assigned To:	Brent Fox
QA Contact:	Brock Organ
Docs Contact:

URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Depends On:
Blocks:
	Show dependency tree / graph

Reported:	2000-12-04 13:03 EST by Need Real Name
Modified:	2007-04-18 12:30 EDT (History)
CC List:	0 users

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points:	---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed:	2001-04-18 12:00:13 EDT
Type:	---
Regression:	---
Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---

Attachments	(Terms of Use)
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Groups: None (edit)

Description Need Real Name 2000-12-04 13:03:11 EST

The content of bootnet.img is not up to date: if one takes the
redhat CD and a boot disk using the CD, with an EATA (DPT PM2144UW2)
controler, everything is fine.

If one tries to do the same from the bootnet.img file to perform
a net install, the installation process will die just after loading
the eata driver from the stage2 file. I tried with the latest version
of stage2 (october), I did not try to use eata from a driver disk.

Anaconda says that cpio of libm is fine. However, Python can not find
libthreads.

I dropped net install and went back to CD install.

Comment 1 Michael Fulbright 2000-12-04 14:03:17 EST

Passed to QA to reproduce.

Comment 2 Brent Fox 2001-04-11 14:57:20 EDT

Is there a Python traceback that appears?  If so, it would be helpful to know
what it is.

Comment 3 Need Real Name 2001-04-12 04:42:25 EDT

Sorry no Python traceback: this bug report is now 4 months old and I just 
installed all the required patches on your web site: performing again a full 
install on one of the concerned running computers would be a nightmare that 
I'de like to spare :-)

Comment 4 Brent Fox 2001-04-18 12:00:08 EDT

Ok.  I understand.  But since I can't see the traceback, I can't debug it.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.