Bug 2170550 - EPEL7 - rxvt-unicode package contains no data
Summary: EPEL7 - rxvt-unicode package contains no data
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Fedora EPEL
Classification: Fedora
Component: rxvt-unicode
Version: epel7
Hardware: All
OS: All
unspecified
high
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Carl George 🤠
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2023-02-16 17:03 UTC by JButler
Modified: 2023-10-08 00:34 UTC (History)
5 users (show)

Fixed In Version: rxvt-unicode-9.31-1.el7
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2023-10-08 00:34:40 UTC
Type: Bug
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description JButler 2023-02-16 17:03:45 UTC
Description of problem:
The current release of rxvt-unicode on epel7 is an empty rpm.
(rxvt-unicode-9.30-2.el7.x86_64.rpm)

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
9.30-2.el7

How reproducible:
Very

Steps to Reproduce:
`rpm -qp rxvt-unicode-9.30-2.el7.x86_64.rpm -info`
shows that the package size is `0`

Actual results:
Size : 0

Expected results:
The package contains some files, else it shouldn't exist in EPEL7 at all

Additional info:
The maintainer has mentioned in the patch notes that he is no longer planning on updating this package. If that's the case, new versions should not be published, rather than empty packages being published

* Fri Dec 16 2022 Robbie Harwood <rharwood> - 9.30-1
- Drop package to be just terminfo file
- Newer versions of libptytty don't build on epel7, and on epel I only care
  about the terminfo file anyway.  If you wish for this to be packaged fully
  again, we either need 9.30 + libptytty patched to build, or a fix for
  CVE-2022-4170.

https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=2101455

Comment 1 Robbie Harwood 2023-02-16 18:08:45 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 2160952 ***

Comment 2 Robbie Harwood 2023-02-16 18:09:30 UTC
The change is clearly intended, as per the changelog you quoted.  I'm really not sure what you hoped to accomplish by showing it to me.

Comment 3 JButler 2023-02-16 18:23:49 UTC
Intended, sure. But why publish an empty package? It's existence implies that it's functional, and it's not obvious why things aren't working unless you dig into a changelogs. I'd argue that the package simply shouldn't exist if it's going to be empty.

Comment 4 Robbie Harwood 2023-02-16 18:35:47 UTC
It depends on the -terminfo subpackage.

Comment 5 JButler 2023-02-16 18:53:37 UTC
If people want to just get the -terminfo, they should install just the -terminfo. At the moment the primary package's existence implies that I can run `urxvt` when it's installed, and that's not the case.  
  
Yes, the package does do _something_, but it's not what people will expect it to do.  
  
Of course that's just my opinion. I can respect your decision if you feel otherwise.

Comment 6 Fedora Update System 2023-09-29 20:09:24 UTC
FEDORA-EPEL-2023-a99c56df6a has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 7. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-a99c56df6a

Comment 7 Fedora Update System 2023-09-30 03:42:13 UTC
FEDORA-EPEL-2023-a99c56df6a has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 testing repository.

You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-a99c56df6a

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.

Comment 8 Fedora Update System 2023-10-08 00:34:40 UTC
FEDORA-EPEL-2023-a99c56df6a has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.