Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because
the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.
RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.
DescriptionMichal Privoznik
2023-02-22 15:25:18 UTC
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #2169168 +++
Description of problem:
Networking receive/transmit_bytes metrics values are swapped
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
CNV 4.12.1
How reproducible:
100%
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Create VM
2. Download large image
Actual results:
transmit goes up
Expected results:
receive goes up
Additional info:
Originally reported in issue https://github.com/kubevirt/kubevirt/issues/9129
Note this is fixed in main:
https://github.com/kubevirt/kubevirt/issues/9129#issuecomment-1415844928
Since libvirt was bumped to a version that contains the fix.
[fedora@simple-vm ~]$ curl -O https://download.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/releases/37/Cloud/x86_64/images/Fedora-Cloud-Base-37-1.7.x86_64.qcow2 -L
% Total % Received % Xferd Average Speed Time Time Time Current
Dload Upload Total Spent Left Speed
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 --:--:-- --:--:-- --:--:-- 0
[fedora@simple-vm ~]$ ls -l Fedora-Cloud-Base-37-1.7.x86_64.qcow2
-rw-r--r--. 1 fedora fedora 492830720 Feb 12 12:36 Fedora-Cloud-Base-37-1.7.x86_64.qcow2
Observe metrics:
kubevirt_vmi_network_transmit_bytes_total: 518623611
kubevirt_vmi_network_receive_bytes_total: 1030624
--- Additional comment from Igor Bezukh on 2023-02-16 17:31:37 CET ---
Hi Michal,
Can you please assist us with backporting https://gitlab.com/libvirt/libvirt/-/commit/0862cb3ce46253a58ca02d36b2b6a6397a60bfc7
to the libvirt release that is in use in 4.12?
TIA
Igor
--- Additional comment from Jaroslav Suchanek on 2023-02-17 10:53:59 CET ---
(In reply to Igor Bezukh from comment #2)
> Hi,
>
> There are plans to move to UBI 9 (RHEL 9 based) in 4.12
> But currently 4.12 consumes UBI 8.6. So we will have to ask Libvirt folks to
> do 2 backports for us - one to libvirt 8.0.0 for RHEL 8.6 and one to libvirt
> 8.5.0 for RHEL 9
Can you please elaborate more, why you need it in RHEL-9.0, which is not being used by CNV? Backporting to RHEL-8.6.0 should be fine. RHEL-9.2 already contain the requested fix.
Thanks.
--- Additional comment from Igor Bezukh on 2023-02-21 10:49:31 CET ---
Hi Jaroslav,
Let me correct myself - we will need the backport for RHEL-8.6.0, we don't plan to switch our base containers to be RHEL-9 based in OCPV 4.12
Is there any action from our side regarding whats need to be done about the backport to RHEL-8.6.0?
Comment 3yalzhang@redhat.com
2023-02-23 04:49:44 UTC
Reproduce this bug on libvirt-8.0.0-17.module+el8.8.0+18133+90800a0a.x86_64
# ip tuntap add mode tap name mytap0
# ip link set mytap0 up
# ip link set mytap0 master br0
# virsh dumpxml rhel | grep /interface -B6
<interface type='ethernet'>
<target dev='mytap0' managed='no'/>
<model type='virtio'/>
</interface>
Login guest, and run:
# curl -O https://download.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/releases/37/Cloud/x86_64/images/Fedora-Cloud-Base-37-1.7.x86_64.qcow2 -L
Check the statistics on guest and host:
On guest:
# ip -s l show enp1s0
2: enp1s0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc fq_codel state UP mode DEFAULT group default qlen 1000
link/ether 52:54:00:88:8b:23 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
RX: bytes packets errors dropped missed mcast
517891022 357101 0 225 0 0
TX: bytes packets errors dropped carrier collsns
20557310 253394 0 0 0 0
On host:
# virsh domifstat rhel mytap0
mytap0 rx_bytes 20557310
mytap0 rx_packets 253394
mytap0 rx_errs 0
mytap0 rx_drop 0
mytap0 tx_bytes 517891112
mytap0 tx_packets 357102
mytap0 tx_errs 0
mytap0 tx_drop 0
The domifstat command shows the statistics from the host view, which is unexpected.
While with bridge type interface as below, the domifstat command shows the statistics from the guest point of view, which is as expected.
# virsh dumpxml rhel | grep /interface -B7
<interface type='bridge'>
<mac address='52:54:00:41:7c:2c'/>
<source bridge='br0'/>
<target dev='vnet1'/>
<model type='virtio'/>
<alias name='net0'/>
<address type='pci' domain='0x0000' bus='0x01' slot='0x00' function='0x0'/>
</interface>
Download the file on guest, then check the statistics on host and guest:
On host:
# virsh domifstat rhel vnet1
vnet1 rx_bytes 509510064
vnet1 rx_packets 227805
vnet1 rx_errs 0
vnet1 rx_drop 0
vnet1 tx_bytes 14086386
vnet1 tx_packets 178018
vnet1 tx_errs 0
vnet1 tx_drop 0
On guest:
# ip -s l show enp1s0
2: enp1s0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc fq_codel state UP mode DEFAULT group default qlen 1000
link/ether 52:54:00:41:7c:2c brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
RX: bytes packets errors dropped missed mcast
509509914 227803 0 1155 0 0
TX: bytes packets errors dropped carrier collsns
14086386 178018
Comment 4yalzhang@redhat.com
2023-02-23 04:52:58 UTC
From the test result above, the "virsh domifstat" can not catch the RX_dropped value, is that acceptable?
On host, I have checked the rx_dropped file, it's also 0.
# cat /sys/devices/virtual/net/vnet1/statistics/rx_dropped
0
(In reply to yalzhang from comment #4)
> From the test result above, the "virsh domifstat" can not catch the
> RX_dropped value, is that acceptable?
>
> On host, I have checked the rx_dropped file, it's also 0.
> # cat /sys/devices/virtual/net/vnet1/statistics/rx_dropped
> 0
Yes it is. Libivirt does nothing more than read this value. If kernel reports it as zero there's not much we can do.
Comment 14yalzhang@redhat.com
2023-03-05 00:27:24 UTC
Test on libvirt-8.0.0-18.module+el8.8.0+18287+112bb4e6.x86_64 with the scenarios in bz2172574#c4bz2172574#c5, the result is as expected.
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.
For information on the advisory (Moderate: virt:rhel and virt-devel:rhel security, bug fix, and enhancement update), and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.
If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2023:2757