Bug 217273 – Missing package key

Bug 217273 - Missing package key

Summary:	Missing package key

Status:	CLOSED CANTFIX

Aliases:	None

Product:	Fedora
Classification:	Fedora
Component:	yum (Show other bugs)
Sub Component:
Version:	6
Hardware:	All Linux

Priority	medium Severity medium
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Assigned To:	Jeremy Katz
QA Contact:
Docs Contact:

URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Depends On:
Blocks:
	Show dependency tree / graph

Reported:	2006-11-26 05:30 EST by Dave Pawson
Modified:	2014-01-21 17:56 EST (History)
CC List:	1 user (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points:	---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed:	2007-04-25 14:47:30 EDT
Type:	---
Regression:	---
Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---

Attachments	(Terms of Use)
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Groups: None (edit)

Description Dave Pawson 2006-11-26 05:30:59 EST

Description of problem: Post initial install fc6, puplet failed to install
a package


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible: Updated t fc6 from fc5, then ran puplet for first time


Steps to Reproduce:
1.install fc6 over fc5
2.run puplet
3.
  
Actual results:
Public key for libgpod-0.4.0-0.fc6.i386.rpm is not installed

Expected results: install


Additional info:

Comment 1 Jeremy Katz 2006-11-27 17:47:56 EST

Had you previously installed all of the Fedora gpg keys?

Comment 2 Dave Pawson 2006-11-28 12:34:59 EST

Guessing, around fc3 time, I had to install one.
Since then, no I've not touched them (nor seemingly needed to?)



1. Where are they
2. Any instructions please / faq or similar?

TIA DaveP

Comment 3 Charles Ferguson 2006-12-05 02:18:06 EST

FC5

The package xxxxxx is signed with a key from Fedora Project
&lt;fedora@redhat.com&gt; (0x4F2A6FD2).  Would you like to import this key?

response...Key import failed (code 2)

Comment 4 Todd Zullinger 2007-01-23 19:22:44 EST

The original reporter's output didn't show what key was missing, but there was
never a libgpod-0.4.0 package in core or extras.  So if that's the package that
is signed by a key that's not installed, he'd have to get it from whatever repo
was providing libgpod-0.4.0 (probably FreshRPMS if I had to guess).

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.