Bug 2174336 - [Backport to 4.12.z] Placeholder bug to backport the odf changes of Managed services epic RHSTOR-3194 to 4.12.z
Summary: [Backport to 4.12.z] Placeholder bug to backport the odf changes of Managed s...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat OpenShift Data Foundation
Classification: Red Hat Storage
Component: ocs-client-operator
Version: 4.12
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
high
Target Milestone: ---
: ODF 4.12.3
Assignee: Madhu Rajanna
QA Contact: Jilju Joy
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: 2187757
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2023-03-01 07:59 UTC by Neha Berry
Modified: 2023-08-09 17:00 UTC (History)
7 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: No Doc Update
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
: 2187757 (view as bug list)
Environment:
Last Closed: 2023-05-23 09:17:28 UTC
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHSA-2023:3265 0 None None None 2023-05-23 09:18:05 UTC

Description Neha Berry 2023-03-01 07:59:34 UTC
Description of problem (please be detailed as possible and provide log
snippests):

The plan as discussed in MS and product pgm calls is to backport all the fixes for the following two epics of ODF 4.13 to a ODF 4.12.z build which can then be utilized both by MS dev and QE to test and qualify the features and their support in the  new Fusion aaS 
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHSTOR-2442 and https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHSTOR-3194 f 


This bug is raised to request to backport the fixes of https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHSTOR-3194 to ODF 4.12.z and let us know which build of ODF 4.12.z would be having  this support, for QE to test.


Version of all relevant components (if applicable):


Does this issue impact your ability to continue to work with the product
(please explain in detail what is the user impact)?


Is there any workaround available to the best of your knowledge?


Rate from 1 - 5 the complexity of the scenario you performed that caused this
bug (1 - very simple, 5 - very complex)?


Can this issue reproducible?


Can this issue reproduce from the UI?


If this is a regression, please provide more details to justify this:


Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.


Actual results:


Expected results:


Additional info:

Comment 23 errata-xmlrpc 2023-05-23 09:17:28 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory (Moderate: Red Hat OpenShift Data Foundation 4.12.3 Security and Bug fix update), and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2023:3265


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.