Hi Please can rubygem-public_suffix be branched and built for EPEL 8 and 9? I checked with the current rawhide and current rubygem-public_suffix-5.0.0-2.fc39 * builds and installs in EPEL 9 mock with out modification. * builds and installs in EPEL 8 if the tests are disabled :-) Happy to maintain which I think is your normal preference. My FAS stevetraylen. I'll take a closer look at the failing tests then.
I am fine with whatever you do as long as I don't need to do anything :)
FEDORA-EPEL-2023-03917cda2a has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 9. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-03917cda2a
FEDORA-EPEL-2023-46499d1e00 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 8. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-46499d1e00
FEDORA-EPEL-2023-46499d1e00 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 testing repository. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-46499d1e00 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.
FEDORA-EPEL-2023-03917cda2a has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 testing repository. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-03917cda2a See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.
FEDORA-EPEL-2023-03917cda2a has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
FEDORA-EPEL-2023-46499d1e00 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.