Description of problem: (lib)prometheus-cpp is a dependency for Prometheus support in nfs-ganesha, which is often a component in ceph deployments. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): How reproducible: Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3. Actual results: Expected results: Additional info: https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/3735/98763735/libprometheus-cpp-1.1.0-1.fc39.src.rpm or https://kkeithle.fedorapeople.org/libprometheus-cpp/libprometheus-cpp.spec https://kkeithle.fedorapeople.org/libprometheus-cpp/libprometheus-cpp-1.1.0-1.fc39.src.rpm
Package Review ============== Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated [ ] = Manual review needed ===== MUST items ===== C/C++: [x]: Package does not contain kernel modules. [x]: Package contains no static executables. [x]: If your application is a C or C++ application you must list a BuildRequires against gcc, gcc-c++ or clang. [x]: Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [x]: ldconfig not called in %post and %postun for Fedora 28 and later. [x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la) [x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs. [x]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. Generic: [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found: "Unknown or generated", "MIT License", "Apache License 2.0", "*No copyright* Apache License 2.0", "BSD 0-Clause License". 132 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/kkeithle/review-libprometheus-cpp/licensecheck.txt [x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed. [x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise. [x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x]: Development files must be in a -devel package [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: Package does not generate any conflict. [x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise. [x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. [x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size (~1MB) or number of files. Note: Documentation size is 20480 bytes in 1 files. [x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: Package installs properly. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %license. [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x]: Package must own all directories that it creates. [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Dist tag is present. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: Package does not use a name that already exists. [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local ===== SHOULD items ===== Generic: [x]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments). [x]: Package functions as described. [x]: Latest version is packaged. [x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-]: Sources are verified with gpgverify first in %prep if upstream publishes signatures. Note: gpgverify is not used. [x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [-]: %check is present and all tests pass. [x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files. [x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [x]: Buildroot is not present [x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) [x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin. [x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable. [x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file [x]: The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files are correct. [x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag [x]: SourceX is a working URL. [x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified. ===== EXTRA items ===== Generic: [x]: Rpmlint is run on debuginfo package(s). Note: No rpmlint messages. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: Large data in /usr/share should live in a noarch subpackage if package is arched. [x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM. Rpmlint ------- Checking: libprometheus-cpp-1.1.0-1.fc39.x86_64.rpm libprometheus-cpp-devel-1.1.0-1.fc39.x86_64.rpm libprometheus-cpp-debuginfo-1.1.0-1.fc39.x86_64.rpm libprometheus-cpp-1.1.0-1.fc39.src.rpm ============================ rpmlint session starts ============================ rpmlint: 2.4.0 configuration: /usr/lib/python3.11/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-legacy-licenses.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-spdx-licenses.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml rpmlintrc: [PosixPath('/tmp/tmp6_xmmyiq')] checks: 31, packages: 4 libprometheus-cpp.spec: E: superfluous-%clean-section libprometheus-cpp.x86_64: E: explicit-lib-dependency libxcrypt 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 0 warnings, 2 badness; has taken 0.8 s Rpmlint (debuginfo) ------------------- Checking: libprometheus-cpp-debuginfo-1.1.0-1.fc39.x86_64.rpm ============================ rpmlint session starts ============================ rpmlint: 2.4.0 configuration: /usr/lib/python3.11/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-legacy-licenses.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-spdx-licenses.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml rpmlintrc: [PosixPath('/tmp/tmpur5f6hbg')] checks: 31, packages: 1 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings, 0 badness; has taken 0.4 s Rpmlint (installed packages) ---------------------------- ============================ rpmlint session starts ============================ rpmlint: 2.4.0 configuration: /usr/lib/python3.11/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-legacy-licenses.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-spdx-licenses.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml checks: 31, packages: 3 libprometheus-cpp.x86_64: E: explicit-lib-dependency libxcrypt 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 0 warnings, 1 badness; has taken 1.1 s Source checksums ---------------- https://github.com/jupp0r/prometheus-cpp/archive/v1.1.0/prometheus-cpp-1.1.0.tar.gz : CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package : 397544fe91e183029120b4eebcfab24ed9ec833d15850aae78fd5db19062d13a CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : 397544fe91e183029120b4eebcfab24ed9ec833d15850aae78fd5db19062d13a Requires -------- libprometheus-cpp (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): ld-linux-x86-64.so.2()(64bit) libc.so.6()(64bit) libcivetweb-cpp.so.1.15.0()(64bit) libcivetweb.so.1.15.0()(64bit) libcurl.so.4()(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1()(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0)(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.3.1)(64bit) libprometheus-cpp-core.so.1.1()(64bit) libstdc++.so.6()(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3)(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3.11)(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3.13)(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3.2)(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3.3)(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3.5)(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3.9)(64bit) libxcrypt libz.so.1()(64bit) rtld(GNU_HASH) libprometheus-cpp-devel (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): /usr/bin/pkg-config cmake-filesystem(x86-64) libprometheus-cpp(x86-64) libprometheus-cpp-core.so.1.1()(64bit) libprometheus-cpp-pull.so.1.1()(64bit) libprometheus-cpp-push.so.1.1()(64bit) pkgconfig(libcurl) pkgconfig(prometheus-cpp-core) pkgconfig(zlib) libprometheus-cpp-debuginfo (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): Provides -------- libprometheus-cpp: libprometheus-cpp libprometheus-cpp(x86-64) libprometheus-cpp-core.so.1.1()(64bit) libprometheus-cpp-pull.so.1.1()(64bit) libprometheus-cpp-push.so.1.1()(64bit) libprometheus-cpp-devel: cmake(prometheus-cpp) libprometheus-cpp-devel libprometheus-cpp-devel(x86-64) pkgconfig(prometheus-cpp-core) pkgconfig(prometheus-cpp-pull) pkgconfig(prometheus-cpp-push) libprometheus-cpp-debuginfo: debuginfo(build-id) libprometheus-cpp-core.so.1.1.0-1.1.0-1.fc39.x86_64.debug()(64bit) libprometheus-cpp-debuginfo libprometheus-cpp-debuginfo(x86-64) libprometheus-cpp-pull.so.1.1.0-1.1.0-1.fc39.x86_64.debug()(64bit) libprometheus-cpp-push.so.1.1.0-1.1.0-1.fc39.x86_64.debug()(64bit) Generated by fedora-review 0.9.0 (6761b6c) last change: 2022-08-23 Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -n libprometheus-cpp Buildroot used: fedora-rawhide-x86_64 Active plugins: Generic, Shell-api, C/C++ Disabled plugins: SugarActivity, Perl, R, Python, PHP, Ocaml, Java, Haskell, fonts Disabled flags: EPEL6, EPEL7, DISTTAG, BATCH, EXARCH
Slightly revised https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/6384/98806384/libprometheus-cpp-1.1.0-1.fc39.src.rpm or https://kkeithle.fedorapeople.org/libprometheus-cpp/libprometheus-cpp-1.1.0-1.fc39.src.rpm https://kkeithle.fedorapeople.org/libprometheus-cpp/libprometheus-cpp.spec
> Name: lib%{sname} Name: prometheus-cpp > %global _hardened_build 1 All builds are hardened by default. You can safely remove this line. > %undefine _debugsource_packages > %undefine _debuginfo_subpackages Debuginfo must be generated. Remove these lines. > %package -n %{name}1 Why adding 1 suffix here? > %setup -q -n %{sname}-%{version} After changing Name, simply use this: %autosetup > %{cmake} . \ Remove dot. > export GCC_COLORS= > export VERBOSE=1 Can be removed. %cmake will automatically enable verbose mode. > %cmake_build %{?_smp_mflags} Remove %{?_smp_mflags}. > %clean Legacy and prohibited. Must be removed. > %{_libdir}/%{name}-*.so.* You must add soversion here. > %dir %{_includedir}/prometheus > %{_includedir}/prometheus/* Should be simplified: %{_includedir}/prometheus/ > %dir %{_libdir}/cmake/%{sname} > %{_libdir}/cmake/%{sname}/%{sname}*.cmake Should be simplified: %{_libdir}/cmake/%{name}
> -DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX=%{_prefix} \ Should be removed. Will be set by %cmake. > -DBUILD_SHARED_LIBS:BOOL=ON \ Should be removed too. Will be set by %cmake. > -DCMAKE_INSTALL_LIBDIR:PATH=%{_libdir} \ Should be removed. Will be handled by GNUInstallDirs.
> %package -n %{name}1 > Summary: Prometheus Client C++ Libraries > Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} > %description -n %{name}1 > Development files for prometheus-cpp library. > %files -n %{name}1 > %{_libdir}/%{name}-*.so.* Remove this subpackage and move everything to the base package. > %{_libdir}/%{name}-*.so.* %{_libdir}/%{name}-*.so.1*
> %{_libdir}/%{name}-*.so.1* %{_libdir}/lib%{name}-*.so.1* > %{_libdir}/%{name}-*.so %{_libdir}/lib%{name}-*.so
> -DENABLE_TESTING:BOOL=OFF If the project has tests and they can be executed without network access, they should be executed. Switch to `-DENABLE_TESTING:BOOL=ON` and add the following: %check %ctest
(In reply to Vitaly Zaitsev from comment #3) > > Name: lib%{sname} > > Name: prometheus-cpp This is a libraries-only package. The other libraries-only packages that I have packaged – nfs-ganesha ntirp, as libntirpc; Apache ORC, as liborc; and Apache Arrow, as libarrow — have passed review this way. I haven't checked every libfoo package but I suspect there are a few others like this. I know that some of the X11 libs are like this. And maybe not especially compelling, but I'll toss it out there, Red Hat's downstream Ceph product has decided (independent of me) on libprometheus-cpp too. All other changes requested above have been addressed. Updated files at https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/3120/98943120/libprometheus-cpp-1.1.0-1.fc39.src.rpm or https://kkeithle.fedorapeople.org/libprometheus-cpp/libprometheus-cpp-1.1.0-1.fc39.src.rpm https://kkeithle.fedorapeople.org/libprometheus-cpp/libprometheus-cpp.spec
Package Review ============== Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated [ ] = Manual review needed ===== MUST items ===== C/C++: [x]: Package does not contain kernel modules. [x]: Package contains no static executables. [x]: If your application is a C or C++ application you must list a BuildRequires against gcc, gcc-c++ or clang. [x]: Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [x]: ldconfig not called in %post and %postun for Fedora 28 and later. [x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la) [x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs. [x]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. Generic: [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [-]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found: "Unknown or generated", "MIT License", "Apache License 2.0", "*No copyright* Apache License 2.0", "BSD 0-Clause License". 132 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /var/lib/copr-rpmbuild/results/libprometheus-cpp/licensecheck.txt [x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed. [x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise. [x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [x]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x]: Development files must be in a -devel package [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: Package does not generate any conflict. [x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [x]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise. [x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. [x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size (~1MB) or number of files. Note: Documentation size is 20480 bytes in 1 files. [x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Package installs properly. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %license. [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x]: Package must own all directories that it creates. [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Dist tag is present. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: Package does not use a name that already exists. [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local ===== SHOULD items ===== Generic: [x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [x]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments). [x]: Package functions as described. [x]: Latest version is packaged. [x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-]: Sources are verified with gpgverify first in %prep if upstream publishes signatures. Note: gpgverify is not used. [x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [x]: %check is present and all tests pass. [x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files. [x]: Buildroot is not present [x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) [x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin. [x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable. [x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file [x]: The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files are correct. [x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag [x]: SourceX is a working URL. [x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified. ===== EXTRA items ===== Generic: [x]: Rpmlint is run on debuginfo package(s). Note: No rpmlint messages. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: Large data in /usr/share should live in a noarch subpackage if package is arched. Rpmlint ------- Checking: libprometheus-cpp-1.1.0-1.fc39.x86_64.rpm libprometheus-cpp-devel-1.1.0-1.fc39.x86_64.rpm libprometheus-cpp-debuginfo-1.1.0-1.fc39.x86_64.rpm libprometheus-cpp-debugsource-1.1.0-1.fc39.x86_64.rpm libprometheus-cpp-1.1.0-1.fc39.src.rpm ============================ rpmlint session starts ============================ rpmlint: 2.4.0 configuration: /usr/lib/python3.11/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-legacy-licenses.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-spdx-licenses.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml rpmlintrc: [PosixPath('/tmp/tmprxqb7muw')] checks: 31, packages: 5 libprometheus-cpp.x86_64: E: explicit-lib-dependency libxcrypt 5 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 0 warnings, 1 badness; has taken 0.6 s Rpmlint (debuginfo) ------------------- Checking: libprometheus-cpp-debuginfo-1.1.0-1.fc39.x86_64.rpm ============================ rpmlint session starts ============================ rpmlint: 2.4.0 configuration: /usr/lib/python3.11/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-legacy-licenses.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-spdx-licenses.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml rpmlintrc: [PosixPath('/tmp/tmp8c783o2j')] checks: 31, packages: 1 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings, 0 badness; has taken 0.3 s Rpmlint (installed packages) ---------------------------- ============================ rpmlint session starts ============================ rpmlint: 2.4.0 configuration: /usr/lib/python3.11/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-legacy-licenses.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-spdx-licenses.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml checks: 31, packages: 4 libprometheus-cpp.x86_64: E: explicit-lib-dependency libxcrypt 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 0 warnings, 1 badness; has taken 0.9 s Source checksums ---------------- https://github.com/jupp0r/prometheus-cpp/archive/v1.1.0/prometheus-cpp-1.1.0.tar.gz : CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package : 397544fe91e183029120b4eebcfab24ed9ec833d15850aae78fd5db19062d13a CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : 397544fe91e183029120b4eebcfab24ed9ec833d15850aae78fd5db19062d13a Requires -------- libprometheus-cpp (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): ld-linux-x86-64.so.2()(64bit) libc.so.6()(64bit) libcivetweb-cpp.so.1.15.0()(64bit) libcivetweb.so.1.15.0()(64bit) libcurl.so.4()(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1()(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0)(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.3.1)(64bit) libprometheus-cpp-core.so.1.1()(64bit) libstdc++.so.6()(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3)(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3.11)(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3.13)(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3.2)(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3.3)(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3.5)(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3.9)(64bit) libxcrypt libz.so.1()(64bit) rtld(GNU_HASH) libprometheus-cpp-devel (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): /usr/bin/pkg-config cmake-filesystem(x86-64) libprometheus-cpp(x86-64) libprometheus-cpp-core.so.1.1()(64bit) libprometheus-cpp-pull.so.1.1()(64bit) libprometheus-cpp-push.so.1.1()(64bit) pkgconfig(libcurl) pkgconfig(prometheus-cpp-core) pkgconfig(zlib) libprometheus-cpp-debuginfo (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): libprometheus-cpp-debugsource (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): Provides -------- libprometheus-cpp: libprometheus-cpp libprometheus-cpp(x86-64) libprometheus-cpp-core.so.1.1()(64bit) libprometheus-cpp-pull.so.1.1()(64bit) libprometheus-cpp-push.so.1.1()(64bit) libprometheus-cpp-devel: cmake(prometheus-cpp) libprometheus-cpp-devel libprometheus-cpp-devel(x86-64) pkgconfig(prometheus-cpp-core) pkgconfig(prometheus-cpp-pull) pkgconfig(prometheus-cpp-push) libprometheus-cpp-debuginfo: debuginfo(build-id) libprometheus-cpp-core.so.1.1.0-1.1.0-1.fc39.x86_64.debug()(64bit) libprometheus-cpp-debuginfo libprometheus-cpp-debuginfo(x86-64) libprometheus-cpp-pull.so.1.1.0-1.1.0-1.fc39.x86_64.debug()(64bit) libprometheus-cpp-push.so.1.1.0-1.1.0-1.fc39.x86_64.debug()(64bit) libprometheus-cpp-debugsource: libprometheus-cpp-debugsource libprometheus-cpp-debugsource(x86-64) Generated by fedora-review 0.9.0 (6761b6c) last change: 2022-08-23 Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review --no-colors --prebuilt --rpm-spec --name libprometheus-cpp --mock-config /var/lib/copr-rpmbuild/results/configs/child.cfg Buildroot used: fedora-rawhide-x86_64 Active plugins: C/C++, Generic, Shell-api Disabled plugins: R, Python, fonts, Perl, Ocaml, SugarActivity, Haskell, Java, PHP Disabled flags: EPEL6, EPEL7, DISTTAG, BATCH, EXARCH
> License: MIT # pull/src/detail/base64.h - 0BSD License: MIT AND 0BSD This minor issue can be fixed during import. Package approved.
The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/libprometheus-cpp