This bug has been migrated to another issue tracking site. It has been closed here and may no longer be being monitored.

If you would like to get updates for this issue, or to participate in it, you may do so at Red Hat Issue Tracker .
RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.
Bug 2181137 - Default q_size doesn't match manpage's one
Summary: Default q_size doesn't match manpage's one
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED MIGRATED
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8
Classification: Red Hat
Component: fapolicyd
Version: 8.7
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
low
low
Target Milestone: rc
: ---
Assignee: Radovan Sroka
QA Contact: BaseOS QE Security Team
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: 2215524
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2023-03-23 08:16 UTC by Renaud Métrich
Modified: 2023-06-19 17:37 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
: 2215524 (view as bug list)
Environment:
Last Closed: 2023-06-19 17:37:28 UTC
Type: Bug
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
pm-rhel: mirror+


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Issue Tracker   RHEL-629 0 None None None 2023-06-19 17:37:27 UTC
Red Hat Issue Tracker RHELPLAN-152867 0 None None None 2023-03-23 08:17:49 UTC
Red Hat Issue Tracker SECENGSP-5120 0 None None None 2023-03-23 08:17:58 UTC

Description Renaud Métrich 2023-03-23 08:16:21 UTC
Description of problem:

By default `/etc/fapolicyd/fapolicyd.conf` has a 640 long queue:
~~~
q_size = 640
~~~

But manpage states the default is 1024:
~~~
       q_size This option is used to control how big of an internal queue that fapolicyd will use. If requests come
              in faster than fapolicyd can answer, the queue holds the pending requests. If the  do_stat_report  is
              enabled,  when fapolicyd shutsdown it will provide some statistics which includes maximum queue depth
              used. This information can be used to help tune performance. The default value is 1024.
~~~

I think the configuration file should be aligned.

Additionally there is a small typo in the manpage:

"when fapolicyd shutsdown it will provide"
                ^^^^^^^^^

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

fapolicyd-1.1.3-8.el8_7.1.x86_64

How reproducible:

N/A

Comment 1 Radovan Sroka 2023-06-19 17:32:35 UTC
This bug is going to be migrated.

Contact point for migration questions or issues: rsroka
Guidance for Bugzilla users to test their Jira account or create one if needed:

https://redhat.service-now.com/help?id=kb_article_view&sysparm_article=KB0016394
https://redhat.service-now.com/help?id=kb_article_view&sysparm_article=KB0016694
https://redhat.service-now.com/help?id=kb_article_view&sysparm_article=KB0016774


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.