Bug 218123 - EDD calls in ks.cfg is failing for X86_64 version of RHEL5 beta2
EDD calls in ks.cfg is failing for X86_64 version of RHEL5 beta2
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5
Classification: Red Hat
Component: anaconda (Show other bugs)
All Linux
urgent Severity urgent
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Anaconda Maintenance Team
: Regression
Depends On:
Blocks: 200812
  Show dependency treegraph
Reported: 2006-12-01 16:34 EST by Rezwanul Kabir
Modified: 2009-06-19 06:22 EDT (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version: 5.0.0
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Last Closed: 2007-01-10 21:06:15 EST
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---

Attachments (Terms of Use)

  None (edit)
Description Rezwanul Kabir 2006-12-01 16:34:15 EST
Description of problem:

EDD calls in ks.cfg ( i.e. --biosdisk, --biospart etc.) is failing ONLY for 
x86_64 install. i386 installations are however all PASSING.
The root of the issue, I believe, lies below:

 In isys.py file, we have:

  def doGetBiosDisk(mbrSig):
    if rhpl.getArch() != "i386":
        return None
    return _isys.getbiosdisk(mbrSig)

  Thus for non-x86 arch doGetBiosDisk() is returning NULL and hence the issue.


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

How reproducible:

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Use ks.cfg with EDD options
2. Start harddrive based unattended installation
Actual results:
Install will abort with errors

Expected results:
Install should proceed

Additional info:
Comment 2 Amit Bhutani 2006-12-06 01:59:30 EST
Breaks Factory as well as Redeployment CD i.e. DSA, so marking as urgent.
Comment 3 Larry Troan 2006-12-07 15:58:43 EST
This is a bug and therefore doesn't require a PM ACK but there is confusion in
the ranks. This is a critical bug for Dell so raising it as an exception for
RHEL5 consideration prior to rc.

Per Jeremy, it's a regression from RHEL4 caused by a workaround for bug 214653.
The fix is trivial.
Comment 7 Jeremy Katz 2006-12-12 16:01:03 EST
Committed my patch
Comment 8 Amit Bhutani 2006-12-13 10:44:31 EST
Jeremy- Can you post the anaconda version this patch went into so we can track ?
Comment 9 Jeremy Katz 2006-12-13 14:52:34 EST
A version dated after the time of the commit; instead of trying to find the
version, you'll be better looking at the changelog for anaconda for the bug#.
Comment 10 Jose De la Rosa 2007-01-03 11:43:58 EST
RHEL 5 Release Candidate Snapshot 5 (kernel-2.6.18-1.2910.el5) with anaconda- fixes this issue. Changing status to Verified. RH - please close.
Comment 11 Amit Bhutani 2007-01-10 13:36:51 EST
RH - Please close as fix has been verified as of RCS5.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.