Spec URL: http://cern.ch/straylen/rubygem-minitar/rubygem-minitar.spec SRPM URL: http://cern.ch/straylen/rubygem-minitar/rubygem-minitar-0.9-1.fc39.src.rpm Description: The minitar library is a pure-Ruby library that provides the ability to deal with POSIX tar(1) archive files. Fedora Account System Username: stevetraylen
Package updated: [fedora-review-service-build] * Much happier, I discovered that the package: $ rpm -ql publicsuffix-list /usr/share/publicsuffix/effective_tld_names.dat which is a much better source for effective_tld_names.dat. * Also converted to pyproject macros which I could not get to work before.
(In reply to Steve Traylen from comment #1) > Package updated: > > [fedora-review-service-build] > > * Much happier, I discovered that the package: > > $ rpm -ql publicsuffix-list > /usr/share/publicsuffix/effective_tld_names.dat > > which is a much better source for effective_tld_names.dat. > > * Also converted to pyproject macros which I could not get to work before. Ignore all above - submitted to wrong place.
spec file and src rpm cannot be downloaded.
Thanks. Spec URL: http://cern.ch/straylen/rpms/rubygem-minitar/rubygem-minitar.spec SRPM URL: http://cern.ch/straylen/rpms/rubygem-minitar/rubygem-minitar-0.9-1.fc39.src.rpm
Copr build: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/5726880 (succeeded) Review template: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2181580-rubygem-minitar/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/05726880-rubygem-minitar/fedora-review/review.txt Please take a look if any issues were found. --- This comment was created by the fedora-review-service https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.
This is an automatic check from review-stats script. This review request ticket hasn't been updated for some time. We're sorry it is taking so long. If you're still interested in packaging this software into Fedora repositories, please respond to this comment clearing the NEEDINFO flag. You may want to update the specfile and the src.rpm to the latest version available and to propose a review swap on Fedora devel mailing list to increase chances to have your package reviewed. If this is your first package and you need a sponsor, you may want to post some informal reviews. Read more at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_get_sponsored_into_the_packager_group. Without any reply, this request will shortly be considered abandoned and will be closed. Thank you for your patience.