Bug 2183901 - Review Request: gnome-shell-extension-screen-autorotate - Dynamic Screen rotation for GNOME Shell
Summary: Review Request: gnome-shell-extension-screen-autorotate - Dynamic Screen rota...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Sandro Mani
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL: https://github.com/shyzus/gnome-shell...
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2023-04-03 02:50 UTC by Luya Tshimbalanga
Modified: 2023-04-16 02:30 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2023-04-16 01:34:01 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:
manisandro: fedora-review+


Attachments (Terms of Use)
The .spec file difference from Copr build 5737628 to 5757924 (888 bytes, patch)
2023-04-07 21:02 UTC, Jakub Kadlčík
no flags Details | Diff

Comment 2 Jakub Kadlčík 2023-04-03 02:56:37 UTC
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/5737628
(succeeded)

Review template:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2183901-gnome-shell-extension-screen-autorotate/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/05737628-gnome-shell-extension-screen-autorotate/fedora-review/review.txt

Please take a look if any issues were found.

---
This comment was created by the fedora-review-service
https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service

If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new
Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.

Comment 3 Sandro Mani 2023-04-07 20:13:16 UTC
Taking, could you take https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2184590 in exchange?

Comment 4 Luya Tshimbalanga 2023-04-07 20:17:02 UTC
(In reply to Sandro Mani from comment #3)
> Taking, could you take
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2184590 in exchange?

Done.

Comment 5 Sandro Mani 2023-04-07 20:20:38 UTC
- Why BuildRequires:  gettext?
- License should be GPL-3.0-or-later
- Use cp -a or cp -p -r in %install to preserve timestamps

Package Review
==============

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed



===== MUST items =====

Generic:
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
     one supported primary architecture.
     Note: Using prebuilt packages
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
     other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
     Guidelines.
[!]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
     Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
     found: "Unknown or generated", "GNU General Public License, Version 2
     GNU General Public License v3.0 or later", "GNU General Public License
     v3.0 or later". 5 files have unknown license. Detailed output of
     licensecheck in /var/lib/copr-rpmbuild/results/gnome-shell-extension-
     screen-autorotate/licensecheck.txt
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
     names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
     Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
     (~1MB) or number of files.
     Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 1 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
     Note: No rpmlint messages.
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
     license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
     license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
     beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
     work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
     provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
     %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

===== SHOULD items =====

Generic:
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
     file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[?]: Package functions as described.
[?]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-]: Sources are verified with gpgverify first in %prep if upstream
     publishes signatures.
     Note: gpgverify is not used.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
     architectures.
[-]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[!]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed
     files.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
     $RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
[x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin.
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
[x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag
[x]: SourceX is a working URL.
[x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified.

===== EXTRA items =====

Generic:
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages.
     Note: No rpmlint messages.


Rpmlint
-------
Checking: gnome-shell-extension-screen-autorotate-10-1.fc39.noarch.rpm
          gnome-shell-extension-screen-autorotate-10-1.fc39.src.rpm
============================ rpmlint session starts ============================
rpmlint: 2.4.0
configuration:
    /usr/lib/python3.11/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-legacy-licenses.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-spdx-licenses.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml
rpmlintrc: [PosixPath('/tmp/tmp818_n_5n')]
checks: 31, packages: 2

 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings, 0 badness; has taken 0.1 s 




Rpmlint (installed packages)
----------------------------
============================ rpmlint session starts ============================
rpmlint: 2.4.0
configuration:
    /usr/lib/python3.11/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-legacy-licenses.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-spdx-licenses.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml
checks: 31, packages: 1

 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings, 0 badness; has taken 0.0 s 



Source checksums
----------------
https://github.com/shyzus/gnome-shell-extension-screen-autorotate/archive/v10/gnome-shell-extension-screen-autorotate-10.tar.gz :
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package     : aff6cb7fb8a229aae9f2012734b2d9393a4c61a6a74dcf2a8005cf609ee067f6
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : aff6cb7fb8a229aae9f2012734b2d9393a4c61a6a74dcf2a8005cf609ee067f6


Requires
--------
gnome-shell-extension-screen-autorotate (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
    gnome-shell
    iio-sensor-proxy



Provides
--------
gnome-shell-extension-screen-autorotate:
    gnome-shell-extension-screen-autorotate
    screen-rotate



Generated by fedora-review 0.9.0 (6761b6c) last change: 2022-08-23
Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review --no-colors --prebuilt --rpm-spec --name gnome-shell-extension-screen-autorotate --mock-config /var/lib/copr-rpmbuild/results/configs/child.cfg
Buildroot used: fedora-rawhide-x86_64
Active plugins: Shell-api, Generic
Disabled plugins: C/C++, Haskell, Ocaml, Perl, Python, R, PHP, fonts, SugarActivity, Java
Disabled flags: EPEL6, EPEL7, DISTTAG, BATCH, EXARCH

Comment 7 Jakub Kadlčík 2023-04-07 21:02:04 UTC
Created attachment 1956304 [details]
The .spec file difference from Copr build 5737628 to 5757924

Comment 8 Jakub Kadlčík 2023-04-07 21:02:06 UTC
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/5757924
(succeeded)

Review template:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2183901-gnome-shell-extension-screen-autorotate/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/05757924-gnome-shell-extension-screen-autorotate/fedora-review/review.txt

Please take a look if any issues were found.

---
This comment was created by the fedora-review-service
https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service

If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new
Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.

Comment 9 Sandro Mani 2023-04-07 21:04:01 UTC
LGTM, approved!

Comment 10 Luya Tshimbalanga 2023-04-07 21:13:44 UTC
Thank you!

Comment 11 Fedora Admin user for bugzilla script actions 2023-04-07 21:15:05 UTC
The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/gnome-shell-extension-screen-autorotate

Comment 12 Fedora Update System 2023-04-07 22:06:23 UTC
FEDORA-EPEL-2023-af25406b74 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 9. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-af25406b74

Comment 13 Fedora Update System 2023-04-07 22:06:24 UTC
FEDORA-2023-6fbcb66b74 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 37. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-6fbcb66b74

Comment 14 Fedora Update System 2023-04-07 22:06:25 UTC
FEDORA-2023-53933b4440 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 38. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-53933b4440

Comment 15 Fedora Update System 2023-04-08 01:34:45 UTC
FEDORA-2023-53933b4440 has been pushed to the Fedora 38 testing repository.

You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-53933b4440

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.

Comment 16 Fedora Update System 2023-04-08 02:40:00 UTC
FEDORA-2023-6fbcb66b74 has been pushed to the Fedora 37 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --refresh --advisory=FEDORA-2023-6fbcb66b74 \*`
You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-6fbcb66b74

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.

Comment 17 Fedora Update System 2023-04-08 02:52:34 UTC
FEDORA-EPEL-2023-af25406b74 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 testing repository.

You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-af25406b74

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.

Comment 18 Fedora Update System 2023-04-16 01:34:01 UTC
FEDORA-2023-6fbcb66b74 has been pushed to the Fedora 37 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.

Comment 19 Fedora Update System 2023-04-16 02:02:31 UTC
FEDORA-2023-53933b4440 has been pushed to the Fedora 38 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.

Comment 20 Fedora Update System 2023-04-16 02:30:52 UTC
FEDORA-EPEL-2023-af25406b74 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.