Bug 2184216 - libsrtp package is out of date and misconfigured
Summary: libsrtp package is out of date and misconfigured
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: libsrtp
Version: 39
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
low
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Tom "spot" Callaway
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2023-04-03 23:57 UTC by Nirbheek Chauhan
Modified: 2024-08-23 01:23 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

Fixed In Version: libsrtp-2.6.0-1.fc40 libsrtp-2.6.0-1.fc39
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2024-08-13 07:45:47 UTC
Type: Bug
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Fedora Package Sources libsrtp pull-request 4 0 None None None 2024-08-06 02:32:24 UTC

Description Nirbheek Chauhan 2023-04-03 23:57:02 UTC 
1. The latest libsrtp release is 2.5 (released 2 months ago), while fedora ships 2.3 (3 years old)
2. Crypto backend in use is NSS which is ~10x slower than the OpenSSL backend when encrypting RTP packets using this benchmark: https://gist.github.com/Sean-Der/7a42bd70edfe1324ccc6ab399d653c0e. On my machine, nss backend takes 12s, built-in crypto lib takes 4.5s, openssl takes 1.6s.
3. Using openssl also allows using hardware cryptography using /dev/crypto
4. Using openssl enables usage of AES-GCM and AES-NI 
5. You can also switch from autotools to meson (or cmake) with newer libsrtp
Comment 1 Fedora Release Engineering 2023-08-16 08:07:31 UTC 
This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora Linux 39 development cycle.
Changing version to 39.
Comment 2 Zephyr Lykos 2024-08-06 02:32:24 UTC 
Should be solved with PR#4.

We probably need RelEng to assign a new maintainer for this package.
Comment 3 Tom "spot" Callaway 2024-08-06 03:08:33 UTC 
Update coming.
Comment 4 Fedora Update System 2024-08-06 03:36:43 UTC 
FEDORA-2024-abc9b782be (libsrtp-2.6.0-1.fc39) has been submitted as an update to Fedora 39.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2024-abc9b782be
Comment 5 Fedora Update System 2024-08-06 03:36:43 UTC 
FEDORA-2024-c4330b3c61 (libsrtp-2.6.0-1.fc40) has been submitted as an update to Fedora 40.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2024-c4330b3c61
Comment 6 Fedora Update System 2024-08-08 03:36:26 UTC 
FEDORA-2024-abc9b782be has been pushed to the Fedora 39 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing --refresh --advisory=FEDORA-2024-abc9b782be`
You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2024-abc9b782be

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.
Comment 7 Fedora Update System 2024-08-08 04:45:47 UTC 
FEDORA-2024-c4330b3c61 has been pushed to the Fedora 40 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing --refresh --advisory=FEDORA-2024-c4330b3c61`
You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2024-c4330b3c61

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.
Comment 8 Fedora Update System 2024-08-13 07:45:47 UTC 
FEDORA-2024-c4330b3c61 (libsrtp-2.6.0-1.fc40) has been pushed to the Fedora 40 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
Comment 9 Fedora Update System 2024-08-23 01:23:10 UTC 
FEDORA-2024-abc9b782be (libsrtp-2.6.0-1.fc39) has been pushed to the Fedora 39 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.