Red Hat Bugzilla – 2184354 – Podman fails to build an image with Error:: Source image rejected: None of the signatures were accepted, reasons: Invalid GPG signature:
Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because
the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.
RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.
I'm thinking this is an RHEL-9.3 AMI gpg key issue somewhere. @arajan can you take a look please? It would probably be good to try this just on RHEL or Fedora and see if you can duplicate the issue there. If not, it's likely something with the AMI and we'll have to point this BZ elsewhere.
Description of problem: Podman fails to build an image with Error: creating build container: copying system image from manifest list: Source image rejected: None of the signatures were accepted, reasons: Invalid GPG signature: Version-Release number of selected components (if applicable): 5.14.0-293.el9.x86_64 podman-4.4.1-3.el9.x86_64 How reproducible: 100% Steps to Reproduce: 1.Launch an aws instance with the latest RHEL-9.3 AMI(ami-05f53ae0afea4aa60) 2.Create Dockerfile including RUN $ cat Dockerfile FROM registry.access.redhat.com/ubi8/ubi RUN touch /tmp/test.txt 3.Execute build with '--network container' in rootless mode or root mode $ podman build -f Dockerfile --network container -t build_test Actual results: Failed with the following errors: STEP 1/2: FROM registry.access.redhat.com/ubi8/ubi Trying to pull registry.access.redhat.com/ubi8/ubi:latest... Error: creating build container: copying system image from manifest list: Source image rejected: None of the signatures were accepted, reasons: Invalid GPG signature: gpgme.Signature{Summary:128, Fingerprint:"199E2F91FD431D51", Status:gpgme.Error{err:0x9}, Timestamp:time.Date(2023, time.March, 22, 19, 39, 2, 0, time.Local), ExpTimestamp:time.Date(1970, time.January, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, time.Local), WrongKeyUsage:false, PKATrust:0x0, ChainModel:false, Validity:0, ValidityReason:error(nil), PubkeyAlgo:1, HashAlgo:8}; Invalid GPG signature: gpgme.Signature{Summary:128, Fingerprint:"199E2F91FD431D51", Status:gpgme.Error{err:0x9}, Timestamp:time.Date(2023, time.March, 22, 19, 39, 2, 0, time.Local), ExpTimestamp:time.Date(1970, time.January, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, time.Local), WrongKeyUsage:false, PKATrust:0x0, ChainModel:false, Validity:0, ValidityReason:error(nil), PubkeyAlgo:1, HashAlgo:8}; Invalid GPG signature: gpgme.Signature{Summary:128, Fingerprint:"199E2F91FD431D51", Status:gpgme.Error{err:0x9}, Timestamp:time.Date(2023, time.March, 22, 19, 39, 3, 0, time.Local), ExpTimestamp:time.Date(1970, time.January, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, time.Local), WrongKeyUsage:false, PKATrust:0x0, ChainModel:false, Validity:0, ValidityReason:error(nil), PubkeyAlgo:1, HashAlgo:8}; Invalid GPG signature: gpgme.Signature{Summary:128, Fingerprint:"199E2F91FD431D51", Status:gpgme.Error{err:0x9}, Timestamp:time.Date(2023, time.March, 22, 19, 39, 5, 0, time.Local), ExpTimestamp:time.Date(1970, time.January, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, time.Local), WrongKeyUsage:false, PKATrust:0x0, ChainModel:false, Validity:0, ValidityReason:error(nil), PubkeyAlgo:1, HashAlgo:8}; Invalid GPG signature: gpgme.Signature{Summary:128, Fingerprint:"199E2F91FD431D51", Status:gpgme.Error{err:0x9}, Timestamp:time.Date(2023, time.March, 22, 19, 39, 5, 0, time.Local), ExpTimestamp:time.Date(1970, time.January, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, time.Local), WrongKeyUsage:false, PKATrust:0x0, ChainModel:false, Validity:0, ValidityReason:error(nil), PubkeyAlgo:1, HashAlgo:8}; Invalid GPG signature: gpgme.Signature{Summary:128, Fingerprint:"199E2F91FD431D51", Status:gpgme.Error{err:0x9}, Timestamp:time.Date(2023, time.March, 22, 19, 39, 5, 0, time.Local), ExpTimestamp:time.Date(1970, time.January, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, time.Local), WrongKeyUsage:false, PKATrust:0x0, ChainModel:false, Validity:0, ValidityReason:error(nil), PubkeyAlgo:1, HashAlgo:8} Expected results: Build is successful. Additional info: 1.No such issue in RHEL-9.2 2.No such issue in the last RHEL 9.3 AMI (ami-0a38322e4ba9b0cbb, 5.14.0-289.el9.x86_64)