Hello, Please note that this comment was generated automatically by https://pagure.io/releng/blob/main/f/scripts/ftbfs-fti/follow-policy.py If you feel that this output has mistakes, please open an issue at https://pagure.io/releng/ Your package (clazy) Fails To Install in Fedora 39: can't install clazy: - nothing provides clang(major) = 15 needed by clazy-1.11-4.fc39.x86_64 If you know about this problem and are planning on fixing it, please acknowledge so by setting the bug status to ASSIGNED. If you don't have time to maintain this package, consider orphaning it, so maintainers of dependent packages realize the problem. If you don't react accordingly to the policy for FTBFS/FTI bugs (https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Fails_to_build_from_source_Fails_to_install/), your package may be orphaned in 8+ weeks. P.S. The data was generated solely from koji buildroot, so it might be newer than the latest compose or the content on mirrors. To reproduce, use the koji/local repo only, e.g. in mock: $ mock -r fedora-39-x86_64 --config-opts mirrored=False install clazy P.P.S. If this bug has been reported in the middle of upgrading multiple dependent packages, please consider using side tags: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/#updating-inter-dependent-packages Thanks!
clazy-1.11-5.fc39 has not so correct requirement: clang(major) = %{clang_major_version} is needed by clazy-1.11-5.fc39.x86_64
Neal, any idea what might be wrong with it? Because this looks good to me: > Requires: clang(major) = %{clang_major_version} During build it says: > line 19: Possible unexpanded macro in: Requires: clang(major) = %{clang_major_version} But I can see such macro exists here https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/clang/blob/rawhide/f/macros.clang.
It seems, that clang-devel-16.0.0-1.fc39.x86_64.rpm, clang-devel-16.0.0-2.eln126.x86_64.rpm have wrong /usr/lib/rpm/macros.d/macros.clang - just unknown binary file
You are right. Reassigning to clang.
The problem is that the source numbering shifted and this is now copying a tarball signature instead of the macro file.
Yeah, we have https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/clang/pull-request/202, just waiting for CI to finish.
FEDORA-2023-119e3eb32b has been submitted as an update to Fedora 39. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-119e3eb32b
FEDORA-2023-119e3eb32b has been pushed to the Fedora 39 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
FEDORA-2023-36b95f852a has been submitted as an update to Fedora 38. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-36b95f852a
FEDORA-2023-36b95f852a has been pushed to the Fedora 38 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing --refresh --advisory=FEDORA-2023-36b95f852a` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-36b95f852a See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.