Bug 2184769 - {Fusion-aaS][ODF 4.13]Remove storageclassclaim cr and create new cr storageclass request cr
Summary: {Fusion-aaS][ODF 4.13]Remove storageclassclaim cr and create new cr storagecl...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat OpenShift Data Foundation
Classification: Red Hat Storage
Component: ocs-operator
Version: 4.13
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
: ODF 4.13.0
Assignee: Subham Rai
QA Contact: suchita
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: 2185012 2186443
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2023-04-05 16:50 UTC by Subham Rai
Modified: 2023-08-09 17:00 UTC (History)
4 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: No Doc Update
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
: 2185012 2186443 (view as bug list)
Environment:
Last Closed: 2023-06-21 15:25:02 UTC
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Github red-hat-storage ocs-operator pull 1913 0 None open Bug 2184769: remove storageClassClaim and add new storageClassRequest CR 2023-04-10 07:57:37 UTC
Github red-hat-storage ocs-operator pull 2007 0 None open Bug 2184769: remove storageClassClaim and add new storageClassRequest CR 2023-04-13 07:20:24 UTC
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2023:3742 0 None None None 2023-06-21 15:25:32 UTC

Description Subham Rai 2023-04-05 16:50:01 UTC
Description of problem (please be detailed as possible and provide log
snippets):

Remove storageclassclaim cr and create new cr storageclassrequest. The consumer cr and code have moved to the new operator so removing the cr and code.

Version of all relevant components (if applicable):


Does this issue impact your ability to continue to work with the product
(please explain in detail what is the user impact)?


Is there any workaround available to the best of your knowledge?


Rate from 1 - 5 the complexity of the scenario you performed that caused this
bug (1 - very simple, 5 - very complex)?


Can this issue reproducible?



Can this issue reproduce from the UI?


If this is a regression, please provide more details to justify this:


Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.


Actual results:


Expected results:


Additional info:

Comment 7 suchita 2023-04-25 06:09:20 UTC
Based on Comment#6, moving this BZ to a verified state.

Comment 10 errata-xmlrpc 2023-06-21 15:25:02 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory (Red Hat OpenShift Data Foundation 4.13.0 enhancement and bug fix update), and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2023:3742


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.