Bug 218489
| Summary: | Old static entries in ifcfg-eth0 prevent dhclient from setting default route. | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 | Reporter: | Jay Fenlason <fenlason> | ||||||
| Component: | anaconda | Assignee: | Dave Cantrell <dcantrell> | ||||||
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | David Lawrence <dkl> | ||||||
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |||||||
| Priority: | medium | ||||||||
| Version: | 5.0 | CC: | jfeeney, jlaska, notting | ||||||
| Target Milestone: | rc | Keywords: | Regression | ||||||
| Target Release: | --- | ||||||||
| Hardware: | All | ||||||||
| OS: | Linux | ||||||||
| Whiteboard: | |||||||||
| Fixed In Version: | RHBA-2008-0397 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | ||||||
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |||||||
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||||||||
| Last Closed: | 2008-05-21 15:29:48 UTC | Type: | --- | ||||||
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | ||||||
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |||||||
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |||||||
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |||||||
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |||||||
| Embargoed: | |||||||||
| Attachments: |
|
||||||||
|
Description
Jay Fenlason
2006-12-05 18:43:38 UTC
What are the config files? Created attachment 142969 [details]
old ifcfg-eth0
Removing the last three lines "fixed" the problem, but it's still a regression
from RHEL4.
This is done in dhclient-script (*yuk*). This bugzilla has Keywords: Regression. Since no regressions are allowed between releases, it is also being proposed as a blocker for this release. Please resolve ASAP. What's the proposed solution here? Is dhclient-script being changed to honor BOOTPROTO over IPADDR? This this isn't happening in dhclient-script, it happens in anaconda. On upgrade, we're preserving everything in the existing ifcfg-ethX file, which shouldn't be happening. Attached is a patch to fix the problem. Created attachment 290995 [details]
anaconda-218489.patch
Upgrade from RHEL4.6 AS to RHEL5.2-Server-20080206.nightly according to scenario in comment 0 works as expected. An advisory has been issued which should help the problem described in this bug report. This report is therefore being closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information on the solution and/or where to find the updated files, please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report if the solution does not work for you. http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2008-0397.html |