Description of problem: On congested line it is unpleasant problem, because copy of even small file lasts too long - sometimes 20 and more times longer than the same operation from command line. Perfect feedback usually isn't too important. The function of the progress bar is to inform user that something is happening but not to brake own operation. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): mc-4.6.1a-30.fc6 How reproducible: always
Based on the date this bug was created, it appears to have been reported against rawhide during the development of a Fedora release that is no longer maintained. In order to refocus our efforts as a project we are flagging all of the open bugs for releases which are no longer maintained. If this bug remains in NEEDINFO thirty (30) days from now, we will automatically close it. If you can reproduce this bug in a maintained Fedora version (7, 8, or rawhide), please change this bug to the respective version and change the status to ASSIGNED. (If you're unable to change the bug's version or status, add a comment to the bug and someone will change it for you.) Thanks for your help, and we apologize again that we haven't handled these issues to this point. The process we're following is outlined here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/F9CleanUp We will be following the process here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping to ensure this doesn't happen again.
*Sigh* :-( , here is a testcase - I've tested it on RHEL5 running on my scrap: (RHEL5 will be living longer than Fedora) $ dd if=/dev/zero of=zero count=2 $ for i in {0..9};do for j in {0..999};do cp zero $i.$j.0;done;done 1) ... copy files to different directory with 'cp' ... 2) delete them (because of influence cache). 3) ... copy files to different directory with 'mc' ... 4) ... copy files to different directory with 'cp' ... 5) compare resulting time My results: $ time cp *.0 cp/ real 0m0.862s user 0m0.130s sys 0m0.567s The same operation through mc takes 4.0s 4/0.563 = 7.10479573712255772646 And it means, that graphics stuff slows down copy of 10002 files more than 7-times on my local machine. I can't imagine to use mc on congested line. It hampers copying/deleting and overal performance of mc. For example, why not to refresh progress bar fourtimes per second at maximum? Most users don't want exact feedback, they _only_want_to_know_ that something happens ... (machine is alive, not frozen) My very first naive idea: ... timerWakeUp = 1; while(copyInProgress){ copyBlockOfFile(); if(timerWakeUp){ refreshProgressBar(); refreshPercentage(); refreshNameOfProgram(); timerWakeUp = 0; } else{ /* * copied names of files will be thrown out * (they will not be displayed) * */ } } ... void timerHndl() { timerWakeUp = 1; }
Thanks for the analysis. Please don't move Fedora/rawhide bugs to RHEL. Just clone them instead if you wish, but bear in mind there is almost no chance it gets fixed in RHEL, since this bug is minor and not critical in any kind and not reported by a customer. Furthermore if you move Fedora bugs to RHEL, they will go out from the Fedora radar so they won't get fixed in any upcoming RHEL.
Changing version to '9' as part of upcoming Fedora 9 GA. More information and reason for this action is here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping
User jkubin's account has been closed
This message is a reminder that Fedora 9 is nearing its end of life. Approximately 30 (thirty) days from now Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora 9. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. At that time this bug will be closed as WONTFIX if it remains open with a Fedora 'version' of '9'. Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' to a later Fedora version prior to Fedora 9's end of life. Bug Reporter: Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we may not be able to fix it before Fedora 9 is end of life. If you would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version of Fedora please change the 'version' of this bug to the applicable version. If you are unable to change the version, please add a comment here and someone will do it for you. Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes bugs or makes them obsolete. The process we are following is described here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping
Fedora 9 changed to end-of-life (EOL) status on 2009-07-10. Fedora 9 is no longer maintained, which means that it will not receive any further security or bug fix updates. As a result we are closing this bug. If you can reproduce this bug against a currently maintained version of Fedora please feel free to reopen this bug against that version. Thank you for reporting this bug and we are sorry it could not be fixed.